level 13
爱吃鸭架子
楼主
Lynn and Vanhanen

Average national IQs according to IQ and the Wealth of Nations

Average national IQs according to IQ and the Global Inequality
≤65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 ≥105 N/A

Average national IQs according to Intelligence: A Unifying Construct for the Social Sciences (2012)
In the 2002 book IQ and the Wealth of Nations, and the 2006 book IQ and Global Inequality, Richard Lynn and Tatu Vanhanen created estimates of average IQs for 113 nations and estimated the IQs of 79 other nations based on neighboring nations and other manners. They also created an estimate of "quality of human conditions" for each nation based on gross national product per capita, adult literacy rate, the fraction of the population enrolled in secondary education, life expectancy, and rate of democratization. Lynn and Vanhanen found a substantial correlation between the national IQ scores they created and these various socioeconomic factors. They conclude that national IQ influences these measures of well-being and that national differences in IQ are heavily influenced by genetics, although they also allow for some environmental contributions. They regard nutrition as the most important environmental factor, and education a secondary factor.[6
2017年05月10日 14点05分
1

Average national IQs according to IQ and the Wealth of Nations 
Average national IQs according to IQ and the Global Inequality≤65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 ≥105 N/A

Average national IQs according to Intelligence: A Unifying Construct for the Social Sciences (2012)In the 2002 book IQ and the Wealth of Nations, and the 2006 book IQ and Global Inequality, Richard Lynn and Tatu Vanhanen created estimates of average IQs for 113 nations and estimated the IQs of 79 other nations based on neighboring nations and other manners. They also created an estimate of "quality of human conditions" for each nation based on gross national product per capita, adult literacy rate, the fraction of the population enrolled in secondary education, life expectancy, and rate of democratization. Lynn and Vanhanen found a substantial correlation between the national IQ scores they created and these various socioeconomic factors. They conclude that national IQ influences these measures of well-being and that national differences in IQ are heavily influenced by genetics, although they also allow for some environmental contributions. They regard nutrition as the most important environmental factor, and education a secondary factor.[6