这个问题已经明显到不能再明显，在官方论坛上有非常多关于这方面的反馈，制作组居然会认为它没问题，在论坛上狡辩。我现在对这个制作组表示非常的失望，可能不会再购买他们的后续作品了。
http://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/showthread.php?721802-Stop-buying-content-DLC!/page2
http://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/showthread.php?743192-Why-is-AI-Pathfinding-so-broken-and-terrible

关于两条线路部分重叠的问题，之前@业余守门员 说是平均分配客流。我观察到的现象极其恶劣，如果两条线路不采用相同的类型相同的车型。部分乘客不停地在两条线路之间换乘，已经不能用“傻X”来形容了，可以用“人神共愤”。
示意图如下：

提前一站下车换乘的问题修了那么久还是没修复。今天刚观察到的，示意图如下：
42号线，TTS tramcar，服务水平是95%。满载108人（我调整了容量）到达站台，只剩下20多人留在车上，下车的人有一半同站换乘2号线。
站台等待人数从138增加到178（还不止，截图之后还增加了一些）。
2号与42号线的下一站完全相同。
2号线采用的是RoyalM，服务水平85%。
制作组狡辩吧，什么乘客们要综合考虑服务水平，哪有从服务质量好的车上跳下来专门去坐一下服务质量差一些的车的。
这样的寻径还叫“没问题”、“达到设计预期”，我真的不知道是那个没坐过公交车的人设计这样的换乘方式的。
官方论坛反应问题还说这个没问题，那只能逼着人放弃这游戏了。运输迷们真是悲惨，玩个游戏还要被无脑的AI戏弄。
另外的问题还有一大堆。人行道人流大容易堵死交通、过快的经济波动、无聊的票价调整、满地图的学校等等等。

Greetings to the producer of the game Training Fever, I'm looking forward to the final publish of your game. Since I'm a huge fan of the game of this kind, I am sincerely proposing some suggestions to you.

My main concern is on the public transportation part, but through your introduction I couldn't find a time table system in it. It seems you adjust the distance between vehicles via the frequency of vehicle departure using the number of the vehicles and the speed of the vehicles. This may be an easier way to handle, but I think adding a timetable system will make the game more realistic. We have a good example about this in the game Cities in Motion 2. This system allows players to dispatch vehicles meticulously according to the real situation as well as different passenger flows during different times Including rush hour, normal time, weekend and night.

We can apply a sparse timetable to a line with less passenger flow in a certain period of time. These combinations can help players adjust their transit system to achieve high profit level and efficiency. So I sincerely hope you can add timetable system to your game.

Also, I hope you can make a timescale which is both realistic and playable. This means not too slow, nor too unreal. I think with this you could make a perfect transit SIM game. My preference of in-game time flow to real time flow is 3:1.
Moreover, can you consider providing a ruleset editor to players. As you know, each player would love to play this game under a different ruleset. So I sincerely hope you can allow players to adjust the parameters like vehicle capacity, the speed of vehicles and walking of people, the consumption of the vehicles, the maintenance, the population and so on. If we have the rule set editor, I think it will satisfies all.
Last but not least, I am paying close attention to your game partly because I've been tortured by the AI pathfinding of Cities in Motion 2. It's just stupid. So I hope you can make a better one.
Please consider my advice. As a fan of transit-SIM games, I'm looking forward to a wonderful game by your team.
Best wishes. Thanks for reading.

It seems that the time span of this game is big, and the producer can't realize it if the time proportion is what I expected, 3:1. Then, could producers consider using ruleset editor to give more handling of the game to players? Let the story written by players. I assume it can use a time scale like Sim City to help players experience the change of era. But within an era, let players handle between rush hour , weekend, night and normal weekday time. To help players get started quickly, set a default rule for all. Once a player get experienced, he can make the game more suitable for him using advanced rules set by himself and play endless hours in it.

http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/cities-in-motion-2/user-reviews
@业余守门员
好多评10分的，老外玩游戏真不仔细。这么鹾的AI都看不出来