有信达雅的说法吗？
是like to do something 还是doing something

My version: I do sleepwalk and kill.

I delight in slaying while in slumber.
用两个 “sl” 音和两个in 来制造平衡和节奏。

I like killing while sleeping?

I enjoy killing ppl in my dreams

我是英语小白 但是好梦中杀人 这个“好”是“经常”的意思还是“喜欢”的意思

Doing something是正确的

It was he who the despot wanted to have killed in his sleepwalking, revealed Mr. Choi.

"I am prone to killing people in my sleep."
或者更贴近历史语境的译法
"I have a habit of killing people in my dreams."

@用户名被你捷足
What if someone unconsciously get up from sleep and do or grab something, can it be called sleepwalk?
ChatGPT said:
Yes — that can be called sleepwalking, as long as the person is asleep or only partially awake when it happens.
Here’s the key idea:
Sleepwalking (also called somnambulism) happens when someone gets up and moves around while still in a sleep state, not fully conscious.
So if a person:
Gets out of bed,
Grabs something (like a phone, glass of water, or clothes),
Maybe even talks a little,
And doesn’t remember it clearly (or at all) the next morning —
then yes, that counts as sleepwalking.
注意，我说的是sleepwalk and kill。

@用户名被你捷足
我的意思是，如果操言属实，是否是梦游行为？
ChatGPT said:
非常好的追问。
如果我们假设曹操说的是真的——也就是他确实“在梦中杀人”，那么我们再来分析是否属于梦游行为。
一、梦游的本质
梦游（睡行症，somnambulism）的特征包括：
发生在深睡阶段（非快速眼动睡眠）；
人在睡梦中起身、走动、说话甚至做事；
当事人醒后对过程没有记忆；
行为是无意识的，不是出于有意图或情绪控制。
二、假设曹操“梦中杀人”是真的
那么可以有两种可能情形：
（1）如果曹操真的在睡梦中起身、拔剑、杀人，而事后完全不记得
→ 那么这确实符合梦游症的表现。
只是这种梦游带有极端的危险行为（暴力性梦游，或称“梦中暴行”），医学上称为 “梦游性暴力”（violent somnambulism），虽然罕见，但确实存在。
（2）如果曹操在梦中半醒半睡、意识模糊，但仍有部分自我意识
→ 那么这属于**“梦境行为障碍”（REM sleep behavior disorder, 快速眼动期睡眠行为障碍），人会在梦中“演出”梦的内容，比如打、踢、喊等。
这种情况与梦游相似，但严格说不完全等同梦游，因为它多发生在浅睡或做梦阶段**。
三、结论
如果我们完全相信曹操所言属实（他真在梦中杀人而非装的）：
✅ 那么他的行为可以视为梦游或梦游型行为障碍的一种表现。
更准确地说，是一种梦中暴行型梦游症（violent sleepwalking），
即人在睡眠中做出危险的无意识动作。
一句话总结：
若曹操所言属实，他的行为可归类为梦游（或梦游性暴力）的一种。
但若如史实所示，那是托辞与多疑之心，则并非梦游。

@用户名被你捷足
Any possibility someone can kill other during sleepwalking?
ChatGPT said:
Yes — though extremely rare, it has happened that someone committed a violent act, even killed another person, while sleepwalking.
This phenomenon is called homicidal somnambulism (sleepwalking homicide).
Here’s what’s known:
In such cases, the person appears to be in a deep sleep, yet may perform complex actions — like walking, using objects, or even driving — without full awareness or memory of what they’re doing.
After waking up, they often have no recollection of the event.
These cases are extraordinarily uncommon and usually involve a combination of factors like stress, sleep disorders, medication, alcohol, or neurological conditions.
In the legal world:
Some people have claimed “sleepwalking defense” in court — saying they committed a violent act while asleep and therefore weren’t conscious or responsible.
A few of these defenses have succeeded, but only when strong medical and forensic evidence supported genuine sleepwalking.
So, in short:
Yes, it’s possible for someone to kill another person while sleepwalking — but it’s extremely rare, and usually tied to underlying medical or psychological issues rather than ordinary sleepwalking.

Is ”homicidal somnambulism (sleepwalking homicide)“ under the umbrella of sleepwalk behavior?
ChatGPT said:
Excellent question — and yes, “homicidal somnambulism” (sleepwalking homicide) is considered to be a rare, extreme form of sleepwalking behavior.
Here’s how it fits:
🧠 The umbrella term: Sleepwalking (Somnambulism)
This includes any kind of movement, activity, or behavior performed while a person is still asleep — usually during deep (non-REM) sleep.
Common examples:
Walking around
Rearranging things
Eating
Talking
Leaving the house
⚠️ The rare extreme case: Homicidal Somnambulism
This is a subset (a very rare and severe type) of sleepwalking where the person performs violent or harmful acts, even killing someone, all while still technically asleep.
It’s thought to happen when the brain’s motor control systems are awake, but the conscious awareness centers (responsible for reasoning and moral judgment) are still asleep.
So in short:
Yes — homicidal somnambulism falls under the umbrella of sleepwalking behavior, but it represents the most extreme and unusual form of it.