苍蝇小小牛的个人资料

听听分析吧...你们的彩色哥要赢感觉脑残好多。有些人和窝狗差不了多少。一个劲的喊着y雅痞p，大狸子，死涵啊等等谁啊什么啊的上台，你脑子有病啊？公号没撤，这和彩色哥在有区别吗？再说彩色哥也能登公号。还有那些脑残。你们难道没有申请过吧主吗？申请吧主，就算你获得票数再多，票数第一好了，苏翔或者那个公号在审批时否决你掉，你同样当不成吧主。何况苏翔已经把大狸子等循环10天或者黑名单了，连根本吧主都无法申请。看问题也不看看本质，一个劲的喊着谁上台，简直跟脑残窝狗没什么区别，你有喊得资格吗？脑残。这次明显被百度耍了，可以说第三个吧主的决定权现在在苏翔手里，他会同意你们的人？呵呵，那地球要倒着转了，不把你循环封加黑名单，就很好了。也可以这样说，李毅吧以后是苏翔的天下了，该黑名单仍旧黑名单，该循环封的继续循环封，还有苏翔封起来绝对会比彩色哥更猛。你接下来就会知道。一个喊的SB可以洗洗睡了，别像脑残一样喊这喊那，也不看看现在的状况。这次除非李毅继续和百度纠缠下去，要求全部撤光重选，不然和彩色在根本不会有区别。@y雅痞p 复制给李毅 @大狸子我给你舔了别删

贴吧诸君，我有一个问题问大家今天看过“余烬”之后，我发现心里堵了老半天，这个问题我不吐不快。我没玩启示录，二太爷在启示录里有怎么样的表现我也不知道，但我更愿意把他当做一个游戏的主角罢了，也就是说一款好的游戏里主角爱是谁是谁，主角不能成为游戏的代名词。而E爷就不一样了，从兄弟会的遭遇之后我就彻底被这个悲催的家伙折服了，同AC2里不一样他，虽然还是一个复仇的故事，但这一次他不仅仅是复仇，更是完成自己对人生信条，对自由的争取。在我看来，他的经历，他的故事，已经超越了游戏本身所说的刺客信条，也就是说我认为他已经超越了游戏，有没有AC这个游戏，这个人都是完整的，单就他的一生就足以打动我,我甚至萌生了今后的续作里如果没了EZIO这个人，都不想再玩这个游戏的想法。所以我的问题是把EZIO和AC本身做比较，哪个在诸位的心中更有地位？

考研翻译真题的一篇文章，大家觉得正确吗？ While there are almost as many definitions of history as there are historians, modern practice most closely conforms to one that sees history as the attempt to recreate and explain the significant events of the past.Caught in the web of its own time and place, each generation of historians determines anew what is significant for it in the past. In this search the evidence found is always incomplete and scattered; it is also frequently partial or partisan. The irony of the historian's craft is that its practitioners always know that their efforts are but contributions to an unending process. 　 Interest in historical methods has arisen less through external challenge to the validity of history as an intellectual discipline and more from internal quarrels among historians themselves. While history once revered its affinity to literature and philosophy, the emerging social sciences seemed to afford greater opportunities for asking new questions and providing rewarding approaches to an understanding of the past. Social science methodologies had to be adapted to a discipline governed by the primacy of historical sources rather than the imperatives of the contemporary world. During this transfer, traditional historical methods were augmented by additional methodologies designed to interpret the new forms of evidence in the historical study. 　　Methodology is a term that remains inherently ambiguous in the historical professionThere is no agreement whether methodology refers to the concepts peculiar to historical work in general or to the research techniques appropriate to the various branches of historical inquiry. Historians, especially those so blinded by their research interests that they have been accused of tunnel method, frequently fall victim to the technicist fallacy. Also common in the natural sciences, the technicist fallacy mistakenly identifies the discipline as a whole with certain parts of its technical implementation.It applies equally to traditional historians who view history as only the external and internal criticism of sources, and to social science historians who equate their activity with specific techniques.

提问：今年的女装打折什么时候开始？主要是这几个品牌什么时候开始——ONLY 艾格 VM谢谢知情人士告知