看到吧里的没有了,就来重发一遍In all these co
苏美尔吧
全部回复
仅看楼主
level 11
看到吧里的没有了,就来重发一遍
In all these considerations, the role of the kings of Kish and of the Kishite Tradition looms paramount. The title “King of Kish” is not on a par with the titles King of Akkad, Ur, Uruk, Lagash, or of any other state of Babylonia. It is the only title among them so full of prestige as to acquire, in the course of time, the meaning of ‘King of Universe.” We know very little about the political extensions of the kings of Kish eastwards, towards the rest of Babylonia; and we know nothing about their political conquests westwards, towards the Mediterranean. Both Luga
lz
agesi and Sargon claim to have conquered all the lands up to the Upper Sea (= the Mediterranean); there is no reason why the kings of Kish could not have done the same。
2020年10月10日 13点10分 1
1