JD双11搞活动，AC23领199-100的券，实际99就可以入手，我也跟风买了一台。
AC23今天刚到货，家里是电信50M的宽度，测试不了极限速度，就简单测试了一下wifi稳定性。正好家里还有一台80多买的新路由3，正好对比一下。
1. 测试环境
测试客户端： 笔记本：MacBook Air (13-inch, Early 2014)
（小米9手机也测了，但是发现ping值抖动很大，怀疑是手机问题就没算数。）
光猫：电信自带百兆垃圾光猫
宽带：江苏电信50M
测试时间： 周日晚11点左右
测试位置：路由器在电视柜台面上，笔记本在约3米外餐桌上
网络环境：居民区，大量干扰wifi信号（笔记本能搜到几十个，近百个wifi信号）
路由器连接设备数量：2.4g约3个，5g约2个
wan口网线：同一根超5类网线
电源：同一个12v DC电源
被测试设备: ac23 vs 新路由3（刷了padavan固件）
2. 测试方法
a) 采用ping的方法，一次ping 30下，共ping3轮
b) 2.4g 和 5g分开测试
c) 路由器刚启动时的ping值大幅波动不算数，直到ping值稳定才开始算数
3. 测试数据
a）ac23
2.4g
--- 192.168.0.1 ping statistics ---
30 packets transmitted, 30 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 1.506/4.617/25.287/6.797 ms
--- 192.168.0.1 ping statistics ---
30 packets transmitted, 30 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 1.432/3.163/13.796/2.365 ms
--- 192.168.0.1 ping statistics ---
30 packets transmitted, 30 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 1.432/3.163/13.796/2.365 ms
5g
--- 192.168.0.1 ping statistics ---
30 packets transmitted, 30 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 1.498/5.897/96.219/16.839 ms
--- 192.168.0.1 ping statistics ---
30 packets transmitted, 30 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 1.560/2.343/4.906/0.670 ms
--- 192.168.0.1 ping statistics ---
30 packets transmitted, 30 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 1.386/2.634/5.450/1.014 ms
b) 新路由3
2.4g
--- 192.168.123.1 ping statistics ---
30 packets transmitted, 30 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 1.185/9.241/75.809/13.156 ms
--- 192.168.123.1 ping statistics ---
30 packets transmitted, 30 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 1.199/6.068/13.062/2.572 ms
--- 192.168.123.1 ping statistics ---
30 packets transmitted, 30 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 1.199/6.068/13.062/2.572 ms
5g
--- 192.168.123.1 ping statistics ---
30 packets transmitted, 30 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.956/12.300/103.134/27.902 ms
--- 192.168.123.1 ping statistics ---
30 packets transmitted, 30 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 1.240/2.130/3.122/0.326 ms
--- 192.168.123.1 ping statistics ---
30 packets transmitted, 30 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 1.275/1.965/2.400/0.273 ms
4. 结果分析和初步结论
比较有价值的数据是平均值avg和标准差stddev
ping的平均值越低越好，代表时延越低。时延均值小反映到游戏中就是ping值低。
ping的标准差越低越好，代码时延波动越小。时延波动大反应到游戏中就是跳ping。
从以上数据可以得到以下结论：
a) 新路由的2.4g确实很烂，ping值抖十分大，几乎不能用
b) 新路由的5g不论是平均值和标准差都比较小，比ac23优秀。

贴一下ping的原始数据，给需要的人参考：
ac23：
新路由3：

新3你刷PandoraBox 19.06 2019-06-07-git-309b313db 试试，我的刷了这个无线比其他固件强多了，AC23收到以后就看了看看，还没动，一堆路由器懒得测试，先看看你们的。

两个路由器网速对比下啊，老哥

垃圾AC23发热的厉害，然后不知道啥时候5G变得时有时无，而且连接不上5G，也无法升级或者恢复到出厂，只要涉及到重启就会通通恢复到设置前