Bashar：对待恐怖分子的两种方式：无条件的爱；让他们知道他们是在支持高压政权
[InfiniteONE 翻译]
Q：在昨天的新闻中，虽然我没看它，这个世界的主要的恐怖分子的头头之一，身着西装，打着领带，在电视上非常平静地说，他们正准备攻击美国人，特别是在美国，然后攻击欧洲。那么，在你看来，应该以什么样的方式，什么样的建议方式，对待这样的人？
B：你要知道，我们的观点永远都是无条件的爱的方式。正如我们说过的，你们可以这样做：你们可以向他们说明，你们知道他们已经杀害了不少人，你们也杀害了不少人，并且你们双方都发现杀人是很容易的。问那个人，问你们自己，你们是否有魄力去爱对方？这样一来，让你们自己认识到，仅仅是你们认为“你们天生就是软弱无力的”这样的信念，让你们必须强迫其他人接受你们的主张。
一个人如果相信他所相信的理念或人生哲学，那么他就会认识到：如果他真地相信他的人生哲学，他就不需要强迫任何人接受那种哲学。因为他天生地知道，那种哲学是自持和不言而喻的。如果你发现，任何人或任何国家或任何群体发现他们必须强迫别人接受他们的人生哲学，那么，他们自己显然并不相信那种哲学。因为任何以那种方式相信某种理念的人（译注：指真地相信自己的理念的人），非常清楚那种理念是不证自明的。这并不是幼稚。你懂了吗？
Q：是的。
B：你们可以与那个人讨论这样的想法：1）你们各自撤回自己的兵力；2）认识到你们都真的非常强大，你们无需伤害任何人，就可以获得任何你们渴望得到的东西。否则，你们就是在说，（你们是无力的，）你们的实相其实需要依靠其他人。你懂了吗？
Q：是的，这是有意识的承认，即他们愿意接受他们事实上真的认识到这样的观念：个人不需要遵循特定的...
B：如果你们希望务实一点，你们可以让他们明白这种类比：他们是他们所对抗的对象的唯一的最强有力的支持。因为，如果他们感到自己被压迫，然后以一种暴力的方式回敬所谓的压迫者的话，那么他们只会给所谓的压迫者更多的理由来施加更多的压迫。你懂了吗？
Q：是的。
B：在他们看来，他们正在试图对抗熊熊燃烧的森林之火的威胁，失去了控制的森林大火。但是实际上，他们是在向它投掷柴棍，让它燃烧的更旺。你明白吗？
Q：是的。
B：这样一来，他们就会认识到，矛盾的是，他们是高压政权的唯一的最强有力的基座。因为他们给了高压政权一个加强控制的借口。你懂了吗？
B：完全懂了。是的，谢谢。
Q：谢谢你。下一个！

*The Strength to Love*
Q: Yesterday on the news, although I didn't see it, one of the major terrorist leaders of the world came on with a suit and tie and said, very calmly, that they were going to target Americans, specifically the United States, and then Europe. And, um, from your perspective, what will be the way, what would be the suggested way, to approach an individual like this?
B: Now you can understand that our perspective will always be one of unconditional love. And as we have said, you can SUGGEST, as we dictated in this way some time ago, the idea that you can express to them that you know they have killed, that you have killed, and that you have both discovered together how easy it is for you to kill. ASK that individual, and ask yourselves, if you have the strength to love each other? And in this way, allow yourselves to recognize that it is ONLY a belief in your innate POWERLESSNESS that says you must FORCE your opinion on someone else.
An individual who believes in what they believe in, who believes in the idea, the philosophy, then recognizes that, if they have /true/ belief in their philosophy, they do not need to force that philosophy on anyone, for their innate recognition is that the philosophy stands for itself, speaks for itself. And if you find any individual or any country or any group of individuals finding that they must FORCE their philosophy on someone else, they obviously do not believe in that philosophy themselves. For anyone who believes in something in that way, will simply know that it will always stand on its own merit. This is not naive. You follow me?
Q: Yes.
B: You can discuss with this individual the idea of taking back their power, you taking back your power, and recognizing that you ALL REALLY ARE AS POWERFUL as you need to be to have anything you desire, without having to hurt anyone else to get it. Otherwise you are saying you are in fact dependent on everyone else for your reality. You follow me?
Q: Yes, that's the conscious recognition that they're willing to accept that they, in fact, do recognize the idea that individuals do not need to conform to a specific...
B: If you wish to be, quote/unquote, pragmatic about it, you can allow them the analogy that THEY are the sole and single strongest support for what they are fighting against. For when they feel that they are being oppressed and they retaliate in a violent manner against a so-called oppressor, they only give the so-called oppressor that much more reason to become that much more oppressive. You follow me?
Q: Sure.
B: They are attempting to fight, in their viewpoint, a RAGING FOREST FIRE of oppression, out of control, but they are fighting it by throwing sticks at it, feeding it. You follow me?
Q: Sure.
B: In this way they can simply recognize that THEY/,/ /paradoxically,/ are the single most strong /foundation support/ for any oppressive regime -- for it gives the oppressive regime an excuse to tighten its grip. You follow me?
B: Totally. Yes, thank you.
Q: Thank you. Sharing!!!

辛苦啦~ 感谢翻译~