性爱大师迈克尔.辛说：NO、NO、NO！

【翻译】不不不！杰克.吉伦哈尔绝对凭《夜行者》拿了一个最佳男主提名。刚才的提名绝对是史上最多的打字错误

顺说有人看过《性爱大师》么？

这位和老吉其实还有点渊源，当年他因在某名导电影里正面全果成名，而这个角色导演本来想给老吉，但他因不愿正面全果拒绝了

SC导演表示莫名惊诧：＠ManMadeMoon | Paul Hirsch just informed me Jake G didn't get nominated for Nightcrawler... Is this a joke?!【保罗刚告诉我杰克没拿到提名，这是开玩笑吧】

影评人奖小广告也来凑热闹：请关心我们今晚开奖直播，我们有提名杰克哟

。。。。。。。

著名影评人也帮老吉喊冤：杰克给出了今年最好的表演却被打劫了，学院将永远也摆脱不了卷福了

路人们的愤怒

这位说不投老吉票的人都是因为在路这个角色身上看到了自己：THIS JUST IN:
#JakeGyllenhaal didn’t get #
Oscar2015 nom. Rumor has it all the actors thought his character was based on them. #Nightcrawler

写长篇骂学院的不是一个两个
1Breaking Down the Oscar Nominations – Three Things to Yell About, Three Things to Not【解析奥斯卡——三骂三不】
第一个提的就是老吉：为神马杰克.吉伦哈尔在《夜行者》中的表演被耍了？去年很多人为《醉乡民谣》的奥斯卡.艾萨克报不平，但和去年有11个名付其实的提名级别表演不同，今年男主这个类别没有那么挤......史蒂夫.卡瑞尔的表演与领跑的基顿和雀斑同级，但他只是主演之一。与此相比，吉伦哈尔却是一个人撑起了《夜行者》。我还没看过《万物理论》，但既然大家都说雀斑演得好，我也承认。但我认为吉伦哈尔的表演才是最好的。【全、年、最、佳。】而他竟然连提名都没捞到。

（原文）
Look, we all know that the Oscars, while prestigious, are not the be-all-end-all of film criticism. There are any number of other distinguished guilds and critical conglomerates giving out awards this year, and they’re all well within their rights to recognize a diverse slate of nominees and winners. (Ok, it’s not all that diverse, but you get the general idea.) But the Oscars are still the most prestigious, most public facing of all the awards shows recognizing feature films in the U.S., and for that reason it’s worth giving some weight to the work that does and does not get nominated. The internet is already being plastered with reactions to this morning’s nominations, so as you wade through that, here’s a guide to three things worth calling down the righteous wrath of God upon… and three that you should just accept as within the margin of difference in taste.
Three Things to Yell About
ONE:
"How in the world did Jake Gyllenhaal’s performance in Nightcrawler get stiffed? A lot of people got upset last year when Oscar Isaac didn’t make it in for Inside Llewyn Davis, but unlike last year when you had eleven men who legitimately deserved nominations, it’s not a deep field this year. Bradley Cooper and Benedict Cumberbatch were both good, but they’re not up to the caliber of Michael Keaton and Eddie Redmayne (and side note: I could have gotten behind David Oyelowo replacing either of them for his performance in Selma). And Steve Carell’s performance is on par with the frontrunners, but he’s sharing a movie with two other leads. Compare this to Gyllenhaal, who absolutely makes Nightcrawler. I haven’t seen The Theory of Everything yet so I’m dealing with what by all accounts is a tremendous performance by Redmayne on reputation alone, but for my money Gyllenhaal gave the best. Period. Performance. Period. Of anyone. Period. All year. And he’s somehow not even nominated."

超爱Master～

学市场营销的同学们，你们的毕业论文可以研究一下华纳的营销手段

我已经看透透了。什么鬼哦！！！
——
十五字
是什么东西？我只知道我是一个快乐的小尾巴。

怎么说呢, 反正奥斯卡奖的公正合理性是越来越差了