level 11
jatoo
楼主


As a non-religious person – I am very content to see people practice their faiths without fear of government influence or involvement … I would fight for their right to do so. But as a non-religious person – I do not want anyone’s religious beliefs to influence, muddy or corrupt a secular, good governance policy. I firmly believe in the separation of Church and State to protect both the Church and the State; I believe in this to protect the rights of the minority and to avoid persecuting others for their beliefs or lack thereof. And now – Republicans realize they have to branch out to more than just white evangelicals. They’re going to need to win people in the non-religious groups and non-white groups.
That’s going to force the Republican party to change some of its policy positions and I welcome the day when we have some sane Republicans to consider for government. Unfortunately – that day doesn’t currently exist.
You can find the full survey
HERE; an excerpt:
When viewed through the lens of religion and race, the voting coalitions of Romney and Obama appear starkly different.
Nearly 8-in-10 (79%) voters in Romney’s coalition are white Christians. By contrast, just over one-third (35%) of voters in Obama’s coalition are white Christians.
The foundation of Romney’s base consists primarily of white evangelical Protestants, who constitute 40% of his coalition. Obama’s coalition rests on two very different groups: minority Christians—a group that includes black, Asian, Hispanic, and mixed-race Christians—(31%) and the religiously unaffiliated (25%).
Notably, Obama’s religious coalition resembles the religious composition of younger voters, while Romney’s religious coalition resembles the religious composition of senior voters. For example, 26% of Millennial voters are white Christians, compared to 72% of senior voters.