一楼 彩色哥

美国
I have a running argument with a friend.He prefers the Beijing one to this one. In your own opinion, which one was morepleasing aesthetically (pleasing to the eye)? please give reasons for youranswers. THANKS
AdditionalDetails:
please, try as much as possible to be impartial and ignoreany biases...i am a great fan of 007, but try to ignore such factors...
我和一个朋友有点争议，他认为北京开幕式更好。我想问下在你看来哪个让你更爽更吸引眼球。并请给出理由。


答案： If you think London was better than any opening ceremony inliving memory, you must be on crack. It was aweful. I couldn't watch the wholething. 如果你认为伦敦开幕式比其他任何一个开幕式好，你肯定是吸了粉吧。糟透了，实在是看不下去。

London opening ceremony is pure trash. Beijing openingceremony on the other hand, was spectacular. 伦敦的开幕式纯粹是个垃圾。北京开幕式则相反，精彩绝伦。
Bejing was 1000000000000000000000000000000000000000… better 北京开幕式好1000000000000000000000000000000000000000倍
这是实诚话。。

The Beijing opening ceremony was better...the London op.ceremony was nevertheless good, but performances and overall presentationseemed abrupt and vague to a certain extent...too many hopes were fastened toDanny Boyle, who produced a good display but not a great one...it was like TheAmazing Spiderman of 2012 which lacked the word 'Amazing'! Big names do notmake an event of such stature successful by themselves...much more isneeded..probably what we expected... 北京开幕式更好。伦敦虽然还行，但是表演和效果在某种程度上很乱，让人摸不着头脑。丹尼博伊尔被寄予太多的希望，虽然他做的还不错，但称不上伟大。就像2012版的蜘蛛侠，还是缺少“令人惊奇”感觉。那些明星本身也没能让这个开幕式更出彩，也许是我们期待太多。。。
i'd prefer beijing's 我选北京 （选的好）


我搓~~没有人看。。

喜闻乐见

挽救楼主尊严