黑普盘 黑普盘
围脖,公主号,头条都是“看笑话儿不嫌事大”,创作搞笑段子和小说
关注数: 68 粉丝数: 205 发帖数: 2,524 关注贴吧数: 134
为我双子女做了一首故事诗,大家看看,分享分享吧。 从前有一个可爱的小姑娘 怀里抱着一个憨憨的布娃娃 她把它当做枕头 每晚 陪伴 日久天长 小姑娘渐渐长大 布娃娃现了人形 人偶眼会眨 小姑娘越来越喜欢它 “如果你是真人,我就嫁给你” 这是小姑娘的臆想,梦语 可怜的小姑娘啊 到了懵懂年少的年纪 性格不合,缺少伙伴 布娃娃是她的最好伴侣 又至梦中 忽闻耳语 “晴天之际,平铺我与稻草之上” 小姑娘醒了 布娃娃嘴动 摸着毛茸茸的身子 泪水滑出 滴到布娃娃的塑胶鼻子上 布娃娃鼻子抽动,好似抽泣 翌日,平置于稻草之上 阳光映衬下 布娃娃好像枕着绚丽阳光 慢慢从稻草上站将起来 到地上,真人大小 帅气英俊,面容笑灿 小姑娘心动晕倒 白天,在阳光下 两口儿幸福的牵手 落日尽,说话间 俊男消逝 小姑娘四处寻找,不得 伤心落魄,惨淡而归家 床上仍有布娃娃 小姑娘惊喜 布娃娃有俊男面孔 不眠 枕在心间 每日阳光,俊男至 每晚月光,人偶诉 “枕头人在,不管你流多少泪水 我是你的肩膀; “枕头人在,不会让你磕碰, 我是你的护身使者; “枕头人在,你安心睡, 我在梦中为你安排第二天的生活” “最爱的是我们两人一起头顶阳光 最爱的是我们两人一起枕着阳光 那彩色阳光,是我的梦想” 天长地久,一日 窗外旭日升 但见枕头不在 厨房飘香 香气掩着俊男面 “放心,我还是做你的枕头”
福尔摩斯原作中一些幽默,温馨的镜头,情节。 一·血字研究 1.他的琴的确演奏的相当出色,不过也像他别的本领一样,有着一种怪异。我知道他能够演奏一些难度技巧相当高深的曲目,因为在我的要求下,他曾经演奏过门德尔松的几首短曲和别的一些他喜欢的曲子。但当他一个人在家时,他就很难演奏出什么像样的或者大伙儿所熟悉的曲子。傍晚时分,他会倚在躺椅中,闭上双眼,把提琴搁在膝盖上,随意的拨弄着。琴弦偶尔会发出激越而沉郁的声调,有时也会变得古怪而畅快。很明显,这琴声表现出了当时左右他的某种思潮,然而到底是乐曲在为他的思绪伴奏,或者只是把他的古怪想法表达出来,我就难以断言了。假如不是他经常在那些刺耳的即兴演奏以后急忙拉上几段我最喜爱的曲子,当作对我耐心的小小补偿的话,我只怕早已经无法容忍了。(由此可以想象,福尔摩斯即兴演奏是多么的让人烦躁,我可以在头脑中勾勒出华生在一旁怒气铮铮,又尽力压抑,然后在听到喜爱的曲子时那放松的神情,这前后对比,真是有趣!) 2·“简直是瞎说,荒谬至极!”我把杂志重重的丢在桌子上,高声地说。“我这一生中还没有看到过这种胡说八道的文章。” “你指的是什么文章?”歇洛克·福尔摩斯问。 “看,就是这篇。”我一边坐下来吃早饭,一边用汤匙指着杂志说,“我想你肯定看完了,因为你在上面做了标记。我承认,这篇文章的确写的挺微妙,不过我读完以后还是难免觉得有点儿生气。这很明显是一个坐在轮椅上玩推理游戏的闲人把自己关在书房里杜撰出来的谬论,一点儿实际价值都没有。我倒想把这种人关到地铁的一节三等车厢去, 让他猜出车厢里每一位乘客的职业。我敢同他下一千比一的赌注。” “那你肯定会输,”福尔摩斯安静的说,“因为那篇文章的作者是我。”(这时,华生还不了解福尔摩斯。) 3·我微笑着说:“听完你的这番解释,事情简直太简单了。你让我想到了埃德加·爱伦·坡的小说中的杜宾侦探,我却不曾料到实际生活中确实有这种人。” 福尔摩斯站起来,点燃烟斗。“毋庸置疑,你觉得把我和杜宾相提并论就是称赞我,”他说,“但在我眼中,杜宾不过是个蹩脚的侦探。他那种先是沉默片刻,接着再突然说出朋友心事的把戏未免有些过于做作、过于肤浅了。我承认,他的确有点分析问题的天分,不过他绝对称不上是爱伦·坡所想象的那种非凡人物。” “你读过加博里约的著作吗?”我问,“在你看来,勒考克这个人物可否算得上是个侦探?” 福尔摩斯不以为然的哼了哼。他没好气的说:“勒考克只知道把事情弄得乱七八糟,除了精力充沛之外,一无是处。那本书令我恶心的要命。书里的问题是如何确定一个逃犯的身份。我二十四小时以内一定能解决这个问题,但勒考克却整整花了六个月的时间。那本书倒可以被当做一本侦探课书来用,教导侦探们如何避免犯错误。” 发现我心中的两个英雄形象竟然这样让他瞧不上眼,我感到非常反感。(福尔摩斯看不起杜宾和勒考克,其实,华生就是映射的道尔,这两个侦探是他非常喜爱的侦探。) 4· 在屋门前迎接我们的是一个脸色发白、长着淡黄色头发的身材高大的男人。他手里拿着一个笔记本跑上前来,热诚的握着我伙伴的手说:“你能亲自驾临,真是好极了!我把一切都保持得很好。” “只有那儿除外!”我的朋友用手指着那条小路说:“即使是一群野牛在那儿经过,也不会弄得比这更糟糕。但是,格莱森,我坚信你已经做出了某个结论才准许别人这么做的吧?” 这个侦探含糊其辞的说“我只负责屋里,我的同事雷斯垂德守在这儿。外边的事情都由他负责。” 福尔摩斯瞧了我一眼,接着嘲弄的扬了扬眉毛说:“有你和雷斯垂德在这二位在场,第三个人当然就不会有太大的发现了。”(苏格兰场警官的盲目自大,相互推诿,而福尔摩斯只是愿意在华生的面前嘲讽一下他们。最后一句话,有双重含义:一,因为有你和雷斯垂德在,你们这么厉害,第三个人不会有什么另外的线索是你们没发现的;二,就是因为你们俩,真蠢,不会保护现场,谁来都不会找出什么有用的线索。)
对福尔摩斯的逻辑思考方式进行研究的英文 1. What does Holmes have to do with philosophy of science? Today, I am going to talk about Sherlock Holmes and his relationship with philosophy of science. Since my talk is going to be something like background music, hopefully, for your lunch, I have chosen a rather light topic instead of a heavy dose of philosophy of science. To begin with, let me briefly outline what I am going to say. Of course you know who Sherlock Holmes is, although you may not know in detail what he did and what he said. Everyone knows that he was a very good detective and solved many difficult problems in criminal investigations. Everyone knows that he was an expert of reasoning and observation, so that he could frequently tell, on his first acquaintance with you, who you are and what you do, or where you come from, just by looking at you. [By the way, do you believe that Sherlock Holmes exists? If you believe that, you are a Sherlockian!] But how many of you know that he was a good logician, namely, a logician according to the standard of the late 19th century? If you already know this and can prove it, then probably there is no need to listen to me any more. For the first thing I want to show is that he was a good logician, and I wish to prove this on the evidence of what he did, and what he said he was doing (of course, as told by Dr. Waston or Sir Arthur Conan Doyle). This can be shown in a rather general way, not getting into any specific details of his reasoning. Secondly, I wish to show what his method of reasoning was. This is a harder task than the first, because we have to identify the essential features of his method of reasoning. In order to show this, I have not only to examine what he says he is doing, but also to look at the methods of scientific reasoning recommended by several distinguished philosophers of science in the 19th century. I want to examine Holmes's method of reasoning in a historical setting; and this has something to do with the philosophy of science in the 19th century, and hopefully with the philosophy of science today. I will examine whether such methods are similar or dissimilar to Holmes's method. Logicians and philosophers I wish to examine are, John Herschel, John Stuart Mill, William Whewell, Augustus de Morgan, and William Stanley Jevons; however, since we do not have much time, I cannot do justice to all of them. If I may suggest my conclusion in advance, for those listeners who are impatient, it is this: Sherlock Holmes was distinctly different from Herschel or Mill or Whewell who may be called a classical methodologist; but he was very close to de Morgan or Jevons who were an advocate of new symbolic logic and probabilistic theory of induction. And this makes him closer to logicians in the 20th century (although I am quite sure Holmes didn't know Frege at all). But what is the point of showing all this? The rise and development of statistical method in the19th century had a great impact on the theories of scientific reasoning, and de Morgan's or Jevons's theory is a newer theory of induction in this century. And such a change of methodology is clearly reflected in the popular stories of Sherlock Holmes, which were written in the late 19th century and early 20th century.
《午夜凶铃》小说里的几个段落,很引人深思 1 安藤不由得想起小时候在乡村田野间,一栋农舍旁发生的情景。那天是个平静的春日午后,就读小学的安藤在放学途中,沿着河川所建造的方块围墙上发现一条像细线般的灰色小蛇。起初他以为是围墙上的龟裂痕迹,靠近一看,才知道那是一条蛇。安藤捡起拳头般大小石头,轻轻的往上抛着,测试石头的重量,然后以投手球的姿势丢出石头。石头飞越过河川,砰地一声打中距离数公尺远的围墙,当场击碎那条小蛇的头。安藤没想到真得会打中,吓得几乎当场发出悲鸣。尽管他和那条灰色小蛇相隔数公尺远,但手上仍不断涌现自己直接用拳头将蛇打烂的触感,安藤不禁用手摩擦着裤脚。                    2“那个是什么?”话一说出口,浅川才发现自己用了“那个”的代名词。没有特定名称的事物,除了用代名词来形容外,似乎也没有其他称谓。                    3   可是我突然想到一件事,高中时代,我们田径队到外面投宿时,斋藤三更半夜跑到我们房间来。你还记得斋藤吧!当时,我们12个人睡在同一间房子里,那家伙一跑进房间,下巴就不停的打着颤,并且大呼小叫道:“我看到幽灵了!”他说他打开厕所门时,看到洗手台旁边的垃圾桶阴影处有一个小女孩的哭脸。你猜,除了我之外,其他10个人有什么反应?                       悬疑电影或电视节目中常常见剧情编成大家都不相信,结果却一个一个被怪物杀害、、、、、、可是,现实是不一样的。                        他们对斋藤的话照单全收,10个人都一样哦!这10个人并不是特别懦弱的人,就算以其他团体做实验,也一定会出现相同的结果,毕竟恐惧感原本就深藏在人的心中。                    4   龙司抬起头说:“你听过人在死亡的那一瞬间,脑海里会浮现什么事情吗?”浅川移回视线,说道:“嗯,留在心底的深刻画面会像倒带般,一幕幕的展开、、、、、、
首页 1 2 3 下一页