popoyx99 popoyx99
-
关注数: 1 粉丝数: 232 发帖数: 9,288 关注贴吧数: 13
我感觉还是日系的 I wanna 有那味 前些天看了散人 I wanna be the stunt 3 的视频,由于没玩过这个系列,一开始我还以为是普通的日本综合作 I wanna ,后面看到中文我就猜是不是 pp 做的,因为国内做综合的不多,做日系综合的就更少了(或许是我孤陋寡闻),一直到看到最后 ED ,果然是…… @鬼畜的PP 。 我喜欢日系综合 IW 的原因,是它永远围绕着 IW 最传统、最关键的内核,地形、刺、坑、机关、会跳的 Kid 和他的小破枪,不管制作人的技术如何进步,还是加了哪些创意 Idea 的 Gimmick ,他始终是以这个内核为中心往外发散的。而欧美系 IW ,就是以这个为核心加上一些炫酷的特效和 Gimmick 等所形成的独特风格。现在国内有一些综合向 IW 个人认为像是欧美系 IW ,但区别是有种不像在玩 IW ,而是别的游戏的感觉。举个例子,国内 FASF 大会有几年的初见综合都出现过以别的游戏如《蔚蓝》、《终结将至》为参考的 Stage ,也不是说不好玩,虽然总的来说是丰富了玩法,甚至可以说完全还原了原游戏,但对我来说,这也是个大的缺点,这种完全抛弃 IW 玩法,除了游戏角色还是 Kid 以外,整个 Stage 流程当中,完全沦为别的游戏的 IW 还是 IW 吗?不是说不可以融入别的游戏,我觉得大可以在 IW 玩法内核的基础上加上别的游戏的玩法和界面、背景、音乐等素材,而不是反客为主,国内光叔等人制作的 Not Another Magic Tower Game 就是一个很优秀的例子。 虽然我不知道以后国内 IW 制作者的主流方向是哪,不过以我的个人私心的话,我希望会有更多像 pp 一样制作日系 IW 制作者出现。 说个题外话,最近日本的综合 IW 优秀制作者 dagger 带着他的长流程综合新作 I wanna be the pendulum 和他的一些旧作一起复活可把我激动坏了,当初他删光自己的游戏和社交账号退网,惋惜了好一阵子,现在终于又可以愉快地玩他的游戏了。
How To Answer Questions in a Helpful Way 原文: How To Answer Questions in a Helpful Way Be gentle. Problem-related stress can make people seem rude or stupid even when they're not. Reply to a first offender off-line. There is no need of public humiliation for someone who may have made an honest mistake. A real newbie may not know how to search archives or where the FAQ is stored or posted. If you don't know for sure, say so! A wrong but authoritative-sounding answer is worse than none at all. Don't point anyone down a wrong path simply because it's fun to sound like an expert. Be humble and honest; set a good example for both the querent and your peers. If you can't help, don't hinder. Don't make jokes about procedures that could trash the user's setup — the poor sap might interpret these as instructions. Ask probing questions to elicit more details. If you're good at this, the querent will learn something — and so might you. Try to turn the bad question into a good one; remember we were all newbies once. While muttering RTFM is sometimes justified when replying to someone who is just a lazy slob, a pointer to documentation (even if it's just a suggestion to google for a key phrase) is better. If you're going to answer the question at all, give good value. Don't suggest kludgy workarounds when somebody is using the wrong tool or approach. Suggest good tools. Reframe the question. Answer the actual question! If the querent has been so thorough as to do his or her research and has included in the query that X, Y, Z, A, B, and C have already been tried without good result, it is supremely unhelpful to respond with“Try A or B,” or with a link to something that only says, “Try X, Y, Z, A, B, or C.”. Help your community learn from the question. When you field a good question, ask yourself “How would the relevant documentation or FAQ have to change so that nobody has to answer this again?” Then send a patch to the document maintainer. If you did research to answer the question, demonstrate your skills rather than writing as though you pulled the answer out of your butt. Answering one good question is like feeding a hungry person one meal, but teaching them research skills by example is showing them how to grow food for a lifetime.
1 下一页