mickeylili的个人资料

【四川电视台弄了个节目叫“第一届石头剪刀布全国擂台赛”】【转自糗事百科】也许外省人不会知道，四川电视台在四川人们心中是个怎样的地位，人们的欢乐都靠他………最近，四川电视台弄了个节目叫“第一届石头剪刀布全国擂台赛”，给跪了有木有！泥马还全国擂台赛啊！电视上泥马还有专家给你分析谁会出什么，结果会是怎样，真心给跪了有木有！！！今天我在人人上写下“四川电视台绝对是全国最二的电视台…没有之一”同学们回“从没被超越…”我再回“因为没人会模仿呀……”四川电视台的领导们，我帮你们的员工发了这条糗百不用谢了…四川人顶个～四川二视给了我们多少欢乐啊！！！【转自人人】我擦。四川台真是尼玛哈嘛批。。。他们搞了个”第一届石头剪刀布全国擂台赛”。。。还尼玛天天放。。。还有专家团来给那些人说应该出啥子。。。还分析哦~”哦，这个，他上一盘出了剪刀，这回合肯定出石头，你出帕子绝对赢。。”。。。。还有个专家叫拳王。。。哈嘛批啊哈嘛批。。。 —————————————————— 谁看了电视的？求真相~~

【研院网站疑似被挂马？】

【教学】【怎样画马】

【关于2011－2012学年下学期期中考试的通知】

【贴吧排名又抽风了】明天又可以体验一下前进1W名的滋味了~~

【我们来比谁手机耐摔吧】

【【太神奇了！！】】

【大家的输入法打SF会出现啥呢？】中枪了，数分，数分，数分~~

【人人的表情有阿狸啦！！】刚刚发现人人的表情也有阿狸啦，哈哈哈哈哈，最可爱的阿狸，难道还有什么表情比阿狸更可爱吗？

【猜】来~猜猜这是什么花~

【这么多年过去了，智商一点没长进】高中时在highiqsociety测的是这么多，十年过去了在人人测的又是这么多，一分不差~~

【微积分】4月22日期中考试各位同学好好准备吧！

【西南交大给博士生“涨工资”最高3000元】西南交大给博士生“涨工资”最高3000元 2012年03月20日 08:30 四川在线-华西都市报西南交通大学大幅提高奖助学金，全校800多名全日制博士生受益 ●奖助学金每人每月分别提高到3000元、2200元、1600元 ●此举是为了提高博士生的培养质量，同时吸引更多的优质生源现状博士生“压力山大” 外出兼职赚生活费昨日，记者从西南交通大学研究生院获悉，该校将大幅度提高全日制博士生的奖助学金标准，由之前的每人每月1500元、1200元、1000元分别提高到3000元、2200元、1600元，三个等级奖助学金获奖人数分别占博士生总人数比例的15%、50%和35%，资助覆盖面达到100%。据了解，标准提高后，西南交大对全日制博士生的资助水平在全国高校中居于前列。近日，该校800多名全日制博士生便可拿到这笔助学金。西南交大研究生院表示，此举是为了提高博士生的培养质量，同时吸引更多的优质生源到该校攻读博士学位。电气工程学院博士生崔诚斌今年27岁，这是他攻读博士的第三年。他用“压力山大”来形容自己的博士生涯：“年纪大了，不可能再跟父母要生活费了；全脱产攻读博士，一个月的补助不够维持生活；有女友，即将面临着成家立业的问题……” 崔诚斌告诉记者，班上的同学几乎都是这样的状态，经济压力成了他们最大的问题。崔诚斌说，学校的补助，加上帮助导师做研究的费用，可以勉强够生活。但导师项目不多的时候，他们就需要“自谋生路”，外出兼职。他认为，读博做研究需要沉下心去，兼职肯定会影响到读博的质量，但迫于生活压力，绝大多数博士生都有或多或少的兼职。措施提高奖助学金标准最高每月3000元 “博士生面临着经济和学术的双重压力，确实非常不易。”西南交大校长助理、研究生院院长冯晓云说。同时，在国家财政性教育经费支出将占国内生产总值的4%，学校办学经费有望增加之后，西南交大坚持将钱用在刀刃上。该校研究生院决定，从今年1月份起，除继续对全日制博士生100%奖励全额学费作为奖学金外，还将他们的助学金标准由之前的每人每月1500元、1200元、1000元，分别提高到3000元、2200元、1600元。其中，三个等级奖助学金获奖人数分别占博士生总人数比例的15%、50%和35%，资助覆盖面达到100%。在确定最高标准为3000元之前，西南交大研究生院对成都市的生活成本和硕士毕业工资状况做了一个调查，“3000元不会比硕士生毕业工资低太多，也能满足在成都生活的基本开销。” 目的提高博士生培养质量吸引优质生源去年12月，西南交大清退了一大批延期博士。之后，还推进实施了诸如设立博士生创新基金、建立博士学位论文标准和博士学位论文质量监控体系、开展博士学位论文质量抽样评估等一系列举措，而此次提高博士生奖助学金标准也是该校系列举措之一。 “清退延期博士生就是把一些不适合在这块土地上生长的树苗拔掉，提高奖学金比例就是为树苗施肥浇水，提高营养，论文质量监控就是防治病虫害。”冯晓云说，“此项措施最主要的目的就是希望提高博士生的培养质量，同时吸到更多的优质生源前来攻读博士学位。” 陈勇华西都市报记者张菲菲

【Byebye, red songs!】

【【霸气侧漏的30秒~~】】

Terence Tao: Does one have to be a genius to do maths? Does one have to be a genius to do mathematics? The answer is an emphatic NO. In order to make good and useful contributions to mathematics, one does need to work hard, learn one’s field well, learn other fields and tools, ask questions, talk to other mathematicians, and think about the “big picture”. And yes, a reasonable amount of intelligence, patience, and maturity is also required. But one does not need some sort of magic “genius gene” that spontaneously generates ex nihilo deep insights, unexpected solutions to problems, or other supernatural abilities. The popular image of the lone (and possibly slightly mad) genius – who ignores the literature and other conventional wisdom and manages by some inexplicable inspiration (enhanced, perhaps, with a liberal dash of suffering) to come up with a breathtakingly original solution to a problem that confounded all the experts – is a charming and romantic image, but also a wildly inaccurate one, at least in the world of modern mathematics. We do have spectacular, deep and remarkable results and insights in this subject, of course, but they are the hard-won and cumulative achievement of years, decades, or even centuries of steady work and progress of many good and great mathematicians; the advance from one stage of understanding to the next can be highly non-trivial, and sometimes rather unexpected, but still builds upon the foundation of earlier work rather than starting totally anew. (This is for instance the case with Wiles‘ work on Fermat’s last theorem, or Perelman‘s work on the Poincaré conjecture.) Actually, I find the reality of mathematical research today – in which progress is obtained naturally and cumulatively as a consequence of hard work, directed by intuition, literature, and a bit of luck – to be far more satisfying than the romantic image that I had as a student of mathematics being advanced primarily by the mystic inspirations of some rare breed of “geniuses”. This “cult of genius” in fact causes a number of problems, since nobody is able to produce these (very rare) inspirations on anything approaching a regular basis, and with reliably consistent correctness. (If someone affects to do so, I advise you to be very sceptical of their claims.) The pressure to try to behave in this impossible manner can cause some to become overly obsessed with “big problems” or “big theories”, others to lose any healthy scepticism in their own work or in their tools, and yet others still to become too discouraged to continue working in mathematics. Also, attributing success to innate talent (which is beyond one’s control) rather than effort, planning, and education (which are within one’s control) can lead to some other problems as well. Of course, even if one dismisses the notion of genius, it is still the case that at any given point in time, some mathematicians are faster, more experienced, more knowledgeable, more efficient, more careful, or more creative than others. This does not imply, though, that only the “best” mathematicians should do mathematics; this is the common error of mistaking absolute advantage for comparative advantage. The number of interesting mathematical research areas and problems to work on is vast – far more than can be covered in detail just by the “best” mathematicians, and sometimes the set of tools or ideas that you have will find something that other good mathematicians have overlooked, especially given that even the greatest mathematicians still have weaknesses in some aspects of mathematical research. As long as you have education, interest, and a reasonable amount of talent, there will be some part of mathematics where you can make a solid and useful contribution. It might not be the most glamorous part of mathematics, but actually this tends to be a healthy thing; in many cases the mundane nuts-and-bolts of a subject turn out to actually be more important than any fancy applications. Also, it is necessary to “cut one’s teeth” on the non-glamorous parts of a field before one really has any chance at all to tackle the famous problems in the area; take a look at the early publications of any of today’s great mathematicians to see what I mean by this.

【米老鼠】兔斯基BUG，原来还可以这样玩 +“闪电” （去掉引号）正确演示：

【记忆中的校园】大二下期才有相机，而那个年代的手机还是30万像素，很遗憾没有更早的记录了。先开帖，慢慢发。

【有同学选了数学文化的没？】你们赖老师出去玩了，所以前两周哥来给你们代两节课。

【庄哥犀利啊】

【数三】【下学期的课表拿到啦】课程号201077030，课序号07和08，微积分（III）-2，外聘6。数三的孩子们要跟哥的，抓住补退选的机会吧。

【看到很多求老师电话的帖子，有必要说一下】每个老师最烦的事情就是期末接到一堆乱七八糟的公关电话。有些老师上课时就告诉过学生，在登成绩前打一个电话扣10分。有些老师虽然没说，但打电话造成的效果不会有本质区别。如果你是重修的、刷分的，没上过课又想要平时成绩，那么应该在平时上课时就到上课教室去找老师问清楚政策，而不是等到考完了才想起这事儿。等到成绩登录后，如果你有足够的自信认为自己的分数有误，可以申请查分。但这是在老师登录成绩后（也就是在网上可以查到自己的成绩后）的事儿。在自己班上的成绩出来之前，最好的做法就是什么也别做，老老实实地等成绩。

【微积分考得不错，祝贺你们】微积分今天早上开始统一流水阅卷，数2、数3已基本结束，只剩下统分和登录成绩了。数1预计要明天才能结束。估计最迟元旦后大家就能看到成绩了。我这学期是上的数2，这次数2考得很简单，除了少数明显整学期打酱油的同学外，大部分同学都考得不错，今天我改过的卷子里就至少有3个满分了，祝贺你们。

明天来江安陪你们考试大家加油吧。

【【真实的川大地震逃难记】】昨晚的地震我是真的一点也不知道，睡得跟猪一样香，早上起来看新闻才知道地震了。在贴吧里看到这些讨论地震的帖子，于是就回忆起了当年5.12之后自己写过的一篇《逃难记》。

【关于购买火车票的提示】分享一些自己知道的以往的经验，但今年我还没买票，有些信息可能有错漏，请刚买到票的同学指正。按照以前的惯例，车站窗口、代售点的预售期为10天；电话订票的预售期为11天；学生票硬座（不包括卧铺）预售期为15天。但贴吧已有同学说今年车站窗口、代售点也能买到预售期15天的卧铺学生票，那么还是以窗口实际能买到的为准。但如果将来遇到窗口不能提前15天买到卧铺学生票的话，记住一定要通过96006电话订票或者12306网站订票，因为电话和网站预售期比窗口长，等到窗口可以买的时候很多热门线路已经没票了。铁道部官方售票网站12306.cn首页上有“关于成都局2012年春运期间客票预售期调整的通知”，1月1日起执行，大家可以去看看作为参考。

【期末之麦兜版】麦兜：麻烦你，给个提纲吧。老师：木有提纲。麦兜：那划个重点呢。老师：木有重点。麦兜：又没有啊…那给个方向好了… 老师：木有方向。麦兜：那样题呢？老师：木有样题。同伴：麦兜啊，老师的意思是所有和试题有关的资料都不会有的。麦兜：啊～那给份试卷吧。。。

江安图书馆什么位置WIFI信号好一点啊？我在顶楼换了两个位置都一个也连不上，连CMCC都连不上。

【求问】在哪里可以查询下学期的课程？请问谁能分享一个不用登录新版本科教务系统的下学期课程查询链接吗？谢谢！

【法国归来：中国人快哭了中欧差距实在太大】这个神一般的模板又钓到了大鱼，这次上钩的是网易： http://tieba.baidu.com/mo/q/checkurl?url=http%3A%2F%2Fedu.163.com%2F11%2F1209%2F10%2F7KQTMNF000294IIK.html&urlrefer=2137047be3abd7525565ff7186f44f80 从俄罗斯到美国，从日本到法国，这回连“卢布”都没改就发上来了，这小编怕是跟着丁磊喂猪喂傻了~~

【高数选课】关于高数公共课（微积分、线代、概率）的选课提示一楼百度。

冬天真的来了好冷啊！！！

【微积分】下学期上数3去了生科基的同学们，再见了~~

【把人逼疯的两种方式】 1、不把话说完；

【请问】新一教B座是哪一幢？每周星期一到星期五晚上在新一教B座二楼教员休息室有高数答疑，请问“新一教B座”是哪一幢呢？“新一教”是不是有A、B、C、D座（其中A座有水上报告厅）的的那个“一教”啊？谢谢！

【提醒】微积分11月5日期中考试今天下午得到消息，微积分11月5日期中考试。具体的过两天教务处网站会有通知。数2的考一、二章。数1的不清楚，可能要考到第三章。

我不是果粉，我从没买过也不打算买苹果的东西但为什么今天我一想到乔布斯就想哭呢？？？

霸气外露！！！泰坦尼克号的完整剧情

【霸气外露！！！泰坦尼克号的完整剧情】

申请吧主真难 mickeylili：4月7日申请，申请失败 mickeylili：4月3日申请，申请失败 mickeylili：4月1日申请，申请失败 mickeylili：3月29日申请，申请失败伤不起啊~~

【回来啦，星期五我会再来的】后天，也就是星期五，还得来江安呆一整天~~

【地球人已经无法阻止江安神藕了】刚刚在人人上看到的：

【泰坦尼克号告诉我们一个道理……】

一秒钟变脑残

【一秒钟变脑残】

【Byebye, red songs!】

【【霸气侧漏的30秒~~】】

Terence Tao: Does one have to be a genius to do maths? Does one have to be a genius to do mathematics? The answer is an emphatic NO. In order to make good and useful contributions to mathematics, one does need to work hard, learn one’s field well, learn other fields and tools, ask questions, talk to other mathematicians, and think about the “big picture”. And yes, a reasonable amount of intelligence, patience, and maturity is also required. But one does not need some sort of magic “genius gene” that spontaneously generates ex nihilo deep insights, unexpected solutions to problems, or other supernatural abilities. The popular image of the lone (and possibly slightly mad) genius – who ignores the literature and other conventional wisdom and manages by some inexplicable inspiration (enhanced, perhaps, with a liberal dash of suffering) to come up with a breathtakingly original solution to a problem that confounded all the experts – is a charming and romantic image, but also a wildly inaccurate one, at least in the world of modern mathematics. We do have spectacular, deep and remarkable results and insights in this subject, of course, but they are the hard-won and cumulative achievement of years, decades, or even centuries of steady work and progress of many good and great mathematicians; the advance from one stage of understanding to the next can be highly non-trivial, and sometimes rather unexpected, but still builds upon the foundation of earlier work rather than starting totally anew. (This is for instance the case with Wiles‘ work on Fermat’s last theorem, or Perelman‘s work on the Poincaré conjecture.) Actually, I find the reality of mathematical research today – in which progress is obtained naturally and cumulatively as a consequence of hard work, directed by intuition, literature, and a bit of luck – to be far more satisfying than the romantic image that I had as a student of mathematics being advanced primarily by the mystic inspirations of some rare breed of “geniuses”. This “cult of genius” in fact causes a number of problems, since nobody is able to produce these (very rare) inspirations on anything approaching a regular basis, and with reliably consistent correctness. (If someone affects to do so, I advise you to be very sceptical of their claims.) The pressure to try to behave in this impossible manner can cause some to become overly obsessed with “big problems” or “big theories”, others to lose any healthy scepticism in their own work or in their tools, and yet others still to become too discouraged to continue working in mathematics. Also, attributing success to innate talent (which is beyond one’s control) rather than effort, planning, and education (which are within one’s control) can lead to some other problems as well. Of course, even if one dismisses the notion of genius, it is still the case that at any given point in time, some mathematicians are faster, more experienced, more knowledgeable, more efficient, more careful, or more creative than others. This does not imply, though, that only the “best” mathematicians should do mathematics; this is the common error of mistaking absolute advantage for comparative advantage. The number of interesting mathematical research areas and problems to work on is vast – far more than can be covered in detail just by the “best” mathematicians, and sometimes the set of tools or ideas that you have will find something that other good mathematicians have overlooked, especially given that even the greatest mathematicians still have weaknesses in some aspects of mathematical research. As long as you have education, interest, and a reasonable amount of talent, there will be some part of mathematics where you can make a solid and useful contribution. It might not be the most glamorous part of mathematics, but actually this tends to be a healthy thing; in many cases the mundane nuts-and-bolts of a subject turn out to actually be more important than any fancy applications. Also, it is necessary to “cut one’s teeth” on the non-glamorous parts of a field before one really has any chance at all to tackle the famous problems in the area; take a look at the early publications of any of today’s great mathematicians to see what I mean by this.

【米老鼠】兔斯基BUG，原来还可以这样玩 +“闪电” （去掉引号）正确演示：

【记忆中的校园】大二下期才有相机，而那个年代的手机还是30万像素，很遗憾没有更早的记录了。先开帖，慢慢发。

【有同学选了数学文化的没？】你们赖老师出去玩了，所以前两周哥来给你们代两节课。

【庄哥犀利啊】

【数三】【下学期的课表拿到啦】课程号201077030，课序号07和08，微积分（III）-2，外聘6。数三的孩子们要跟哥的，抓住补退选的机会吧。

【看到很多求老师电话的帖子，有必要说一下】每个老师最烦的事情就是期末接到一堆乱七八糟的公关电话。有些老师上课时就告诉过学生，在登成绩前打一个电话扣10分。有些老师虽然没说，但打电话造成的效果不会有本质区别。如果你是重修的、刷分的，没上过课又想要平时成绩，那么应该在平时上课时就到上课教室去找老师问清楚政策，而不是等到考完了才想起这事儿。等到成绩登录后，如果你有足够的自信认为自己的分数有误，可以申请查分。但这是在老师登录成绩后（也就是在网上可以查到自己的成绩后）的事儿。在自己班上的成绩出来之前，最好的做法就是什么也别做，老老实实地等成绩。

【高数选课】关于高数公共课（微积分、线代、概率）的选课提示一楼百度。