我爱巴乔1994 我爱巴乔1994
关注数: 3 粉丝数: 293 发帖数: 508 关注贴吧数: 3
老戏新看之我的上海滩 许文强中弹的那一瞬间,我头脑里有闪出了一个人,《天与地》里的刘德华,在他死时,杀他的人对他说:“不是你不优秀,只是生不逢时!” 的确,一直以来我都有一种旧上海情结,以前的我以为那是金庸先生曾说过的“每个男人都有的武侠梦。”渐渐长大,曾经的武侠梦早已化为记忆,心里也不会再去崇拜那些所谓的战无不胜的武林高手或那些肩负血海深仇的孤胆英雄,因为那样的人的人格是不完整的,他们的存在脱离了时代,纵然在他们身上有刻骨铭心的爱情,有感天动地的亲情,有义薄云天的友情,但那都是他们的,于我,已经没有了精神寄托。 《上海滩》我十年前就看过,那时只在脑海中留下了爱情,友情与满腔的仇恨。现在又看了遍《新上海滩》,才感觉我的年少。许文强的形象之所以光彩照人,他与冯程程的爱情之所以那么凄惋美丽,他与丁力的兄弟情之所以那么荡气回肠,不是编剧描写地有多么打动人心,而是在那样一个动荡的时代,在新旧思想冲击的上海滩,居然还能找到那么纯粹的真情流露。纵使有万千变化的华丽外表,也难掩其浮华过后的单纯的真挚的光芒。 旧上海早已远去,那时的烟云却依然能浸袭我的神经,战火弥漫之下,曾经有多少个为了自由,平等,爱情而不屈的生命。一个人或一群人的争扎总是凄凉的,无数这样的人的鲜血却奏出了旧上海最华丽的乐章。 许文强在中弹倒下那一刻,死去的只是一个一心复仇的灵魂,正如《天与地》最后倒下的也只是一个未完全觉醒的青年军人。正是这悲得窒息的一瞬,宣告了那个时代的主题必然是抗争! 前天正好是五四,我坐在回学校的车上想着,倘若我的大学生涯在1919,我会屈服还是抗争?!
ISSUE05 Does it reasonable to make things as simple as possible?I concede that in a limited area such as baby's education people need to make trivias the more superficial the better.However,to a large extent,eapecially ,when it comes to war and science of physical,the conclusion is totally unavailable.To begin with,war which represents the interest of statesman and civil people in these nations that are involved in warfare and which are influence by arms is a thing that the complexity is the main character.consider the second world war in which more than one hundred of countries and regions participated,it is not only contains the contest of policy,economic and military but cultures and races.Although we can convice a few precise militants ,the source is too complicated to ascribe to minority.More recently,arms adds terrorism and nonarchism even,thus to make the source of war too simple has no value to deal with affairs of international.Turning next to science of physical.common sense indicates that the phenomenon we saw would not the fact implys that people should not trust feeling only but consider every detail in the science studying.One supportable exanple of "two iron balls".it is receivable that if weo balls which are different in weight drop from a tower,the heavyer the fall quicker. Nevertheless,the experiment that Galileo who threw two balls which have mentionde above from a famous tower did disproves the receivable prespect.In short,with out adequate practices and inferences,not should people drew a hasty conclusion.However,baby's education i think insofar would maintain the speaker's assertion. Understandable, infant learn a myriad amounts of behaviours only if they can hear,touch and observe it. In other words,while parents teach something to their children,they should make it as concrete and simple as possible rather than to make it complex and abstruct.In sun,as war and science of physical a large number of things possess complexity by nature,we should never force our subject ming that to make things more simple upon them with out enough investgate.
我的第一篇ARGU,希望大家给点批评和建议哈。 In this argument,the author arrives at the conclusion that North Americans shoule eat soy on a regular basis as a way of prevent ing fatifue and depression. To substantiate this conslusion, the author point out that North Americans suffer more serious from these problems than do people living in Asia.In addition,the author adduces the evidence that soy contains phytocheming callde isoflavones,which have been found to possess disease-preventing properties.At first glance,the argument appears to be somehow defensible,but further reflection reveals that it suffers from several critical flaws.In the first place,the argument is fraught with vague and unwarranted assumption that North Americans suffer far greater from fatigue and depression than do Asians only because North Americans do not eat enough soy.In fact,more discreet inspection would disclose that there are some other possibility factors which would explain the distinction.Such as life quality,diet construction and environment condition.Without considering and ruling out other possibility foctors,the author cannot draw any conclusion at all.In the second place,the author unfairly assumes that isoflavones which have been found to possess disease-preventing properties have the effect on preventing fatigue and depression.The argument supplies no evidence to support this assunption. Common secse infroms me that a myriad of foods aslo have the capability of disease-preventing,such as orange which help body to inoculate some illness that attribute to lack viramin C. Since the author does not give a definite determination of disease,any conclusion cannot convince me.In the third place,even if soy have the effect of preventing fatigue and depression. It is entiry plssible that other foods have the equal effect as soy.However,the author offers no information to rule out other possible.In sum,as it stands the argument is wholy unpersuasive.To bolster it the author must show a firm evidence that soy has the effect of prevent fatigue and depression.Also,the argument need to supplies infromation of comparing soy with other disease -preventing food.
我的第一篇ISSUE,希望大家给点意见和建议哈。谢谢 Does the artist give society something of lasting valve, but the critic?I strongly agree with the author's claim.However,i think the author unfairly overlooks some exploits of the critic. Consider tuo respects of exploits.First, the critic give us some important advises of which artefact is worth to study while which is not,secondly,the critic point out some artists' flaws which can help artist to create more perfect artefact.Admittdely,a myriad of artefactes inhere of considerable lasting valve.For instance,the novel of which is worth for both authors and historians.For authors,they can learn a lot of superior sentences from it,also,they can attain many valvable means to express people's psychic movement.For historians,they would understand many aspects of the time period in which the navel's people live through study some descriptions of cities,houses,locomotion and so on in the book. Consider suthor and historian's attainment would apply to many sectors-such as school,library,organization of sciential,etc-of society to correct and inspire people's appreciation of aesthetics,and to make our circumstance more confortable and reconciliation.I must also indicate that something which was created by artist has remarkable utility worth as well.take music for example.Common sense indicated that music has the only useful for amusement.Nevertheless,in recent study,the so-callde "common sense" has been turned over by the evidence of that some special music can stimulate cows generating more milk.However,it is equally beneficial to understand and appreciate the exploits of the critic. Consider first the valve of suggesting people the artefact which is worth to appriate while which is not.Admittedly,these advises have helped free up our time which we can spend on family,community and coworkers.Next consider the value of critic pointing out some artists' flaws. I concede that some critices reproach other especially celebrity just for appearing more frequently on TV or magazineand attaining a lot of money. However,there are a myriad of critics who themself are knowledgeable in art having gave many useful advises to artists for which create perfect artefact since they found their flaws.For instance,movie fans aways observe some bugs of the film which they for nither reputation nor money,but hoping it more attractive.In sum,the artist give considerable lasting value to sociery not only about studying but also about our life.Nevertheless,we must think over the exploit of critic.
1 下一页