teddymee teddymee
关注数: 5 粉丝数: 20 发帖数: 2,861 关注贴吧数: 31
于 2014 年 4 月 17 日发表 客座撰稿人 Luke Gwalchmai 评论 Bradley 在 Doctor Who 里演的两个截然不同的角色以祝寿。几天是 David Bradley的第七十二个生日。Bradley 是一位在荧幕上演过许多不同种类角色——有邪恶的、又搞笑的、也有哪惹人爱的主角——的演员。David 在 1942 年于约克郡的约克市出生并于伦敦的皇家戏剧艺术学院学做一演员。他因在 Harry Potter 电影中扮演 Argus Filch和在 Game of Thrones 中扮演 Walder Frey 而众所周知。David 一名一流的舞台剧演员,在 1991 年凭借在一出李尔王中的表演赢得一 Laurence Olivier Award。它同样也曾出现于热播的 ITV 系列剧 Broadchurch 及如 Hot Fuzz 和 Captain America: The First Avenger 的电影中。 Bradley 是一名多才多艺的演员,而我们则非常幸运的能在荧幕上不止一次地见到他表演于 DW 的世界中。这篇文章会洞悉他在 Doctor Who 里演的两个截然不同的角色以祝其寿。 所罗门——飞船上的恐龙 我第一次在电视上见到 David Bradley 便是在第七季的这有趣的一集中。他的角色是一个很让人不舒服的贩子。在他叫他的机器人们捉来 Doctor, Rory 和 Rory 他爸后,他出现在了这集当中。因为他想让 Doctor 治好他被恐龙袭击的腿。我们很快便了解到他曾发出求救信号并被 Silurians 接收到。但是当他了解到 Silurian 船上的“货物”(恐龙)及其价值时,他命令他的两个机器人把爬行人扔到太空去。所罗门是个大变态,只惦记着从他可以找到的东西中获利,无论活物或死物。要是他能估出 Doctor 的价值便会把它也卖了。他谋杀了小三角只为了想 Doctor 证明他除了自己的命其他谁的都不在乎。只要合他心意,它可以愉悦的毁灭掉大批无辜的物种。所罗门真的是个歹毒的角,他绑架了那飞啼啼女王只为其价值。然而当他也许想把她卖了赚钱时,有清晰的表现出了(性)虐待她的意图。 所罗门的行为能让你脊柱发凉,并向你展示他的心有多冷。他是个不折不扣的恶人,他恶到家了,并在那几快结尾时被 Doctor 陷在被导弹锁定的飞船里等死见了棺材。 这使 Doctor 脱离角色了吗?这不是我要谈的。但所罗门真该死吗/但所罗门真该如此死吗?也许。对于所罗门那种人来说赎罪绝不可能,他绝不会变。当他求 Doctor 饶命——通过给 Doctor 任何他想要的东西——时便证明了这一点。对于所罗门见了棺材都还是钱本位,只能说狗改不了那啥。 所罗门是由 David Bradley 超凡地演绎的卓尔不群的歹人。他是个老派恶棍,阴毒,不懊悔,绝无救赎的机会。David Bradley 不仅与 Matt Smith 演了几场戏,还展现了它能将一个混蛋演绎的多淋漓尽致。 William Hartnell -- 时空之旅 An Adventure in Space and Time 是在 50 周年特别集前两天播出的卓尔不群的文献电视片/纪实电视剧。它再现了 1963 年制作 Doctor Who 时的情景,而 David Bradley 演绎了William Hartnell 那个第一次将 Doctor 这个角色演活了的人。再次我们见证了 Hartnell 作为 Doctor 的阴晴圆缺。我们看到他初得此角时,急切的想要演一个与他曾展现的曾众所周知的军事硬汉形象不同类的角色。虽然极不情愿演儿童节目,Hartnel 最终却不后悔接受了这个角色。它如同团队里的其他人一样,有着棘手的开端,最终开始适应,而 Doctor Who 大获成功。公共汽车上有孩子们装作 Daleks,公众对 Hartnell 的看法也改变了:他不再只是被当作演粗暴的戏的了,还是一个穿梭于时间的外星人、各地孩子的英雄、不列颠的经典形象。Hartnell 显然沉浸于他受到的瞩目,与当地公园里的孩子们一同表演/玩 Doctor Who。 渐渐的,随着剧继续 (moves on), 我们看到 Hartnell 生活中核心的人开始分道扬镳 (move on). Carole Ann Ford, Hartnell’ 剧中的孙女 Susan,刚开始时不和,之后很亲,决定离开。当大部分原始 演员剧组成员包括 Verity Lambert -- Hartnell 当时的好友离开后,他的健康开始下滑。这使得他变得易怒并忘记台词,似的被人很难与他合作,使得他让 Sydney Newman 给他减轻工作量,却被告知他将会被换下。 Hartnell 与角色日久生情,无法接受这个决定,但是又不得不极不情愿地接受现实。在接下来的酸楚的场景中,他向他的妻子倾诉心声,坦白自己不想离开 Doctor Who. Bradley 在此极出色的演绎了一个不得不离开他爱的剧的悲痛欲绝、失望的人。David Bradley 也很贴切。有着与 William Hartnell 离奇的相似之处的 Bradley 完美的领略到了角色并极致地展现了一个挣扎于在拥有梦想的角色、事业的顶峰、被举国上下千家万户敬仰时,由于年迈及身体原因在他的生涯尾期被赶出角色的演员。他给了我们一段难忘的演出并是我们了解William Hartnell 是如何给 Doctor Who 里的这一角色注入生命的。 http://tieba.baidu.com/mo/q/checkurl?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fembed%2FhYsH8343ILI%3Fcolor1%3Dd6d6d6%26color2%3Df0f0f0%26border%3D0%26fs%3D1%26hl%3Den%26modestbranding%3D1%26loop%3D0%26showinfo%3D0%26iv_load_policy%3D3%26showsearch%3D0%26rel%3D&urlrefer=b31cbf587cfec2f3a23e211dd0ce2e51 如上为 David Bradley 在 Doctor Who 世界中扮演的两大角色。两个角色的鲜明对比及他因表演所获得的赞许,展现了他是一位多么的灵活多变的演员。我们是多么的幸运名荣幸能有这位娴熟、才华横溢的演员在 Doctor Who 的 50 周年为我们演一出戏,而且还能让他为我们表演一小集。他是一名有着极高水准的演员,我们并因该感谢他为使我们了解 William Hartnell 和(对于我们中的一部分来说来说)第一位 Doctor 而作出的贡献。随意七十二岁高龄,但依然显得年轻且蒸蒸日上,至少你们还可以在荧幕上见到 David Bradley 一段时间。非常感谢你们阅读。 生日快乐,David, 过个好生日! 来自 http://tieba.baidu.com/mo/q/checkurl?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.doctorwhotv.co.uk%2Fcelebrating-david-bradley-62549.htm%3Futm_source%3Dfeedburner%26utm_medium%3Dfeed%26utm_campaign%3DFeed%253A%2BDoctorWhoTv%2B%2528Doctor%2BWho%2BTV%2529&urlrefer=829ebaff69aea9c136c86d59e54aff70 原始内容版权 © 2005-2014 Doctor Who TV. 保留一切权利 Doctor Who is © BBC. (Doctor Who 版权属于 BBC)
Unpopular Opinion: Asylum of the Daleks PUBLISHED APRIL 11, 2014 Guest contributor Daniel Massey gives an alternate viewpoint on the Series 7 opener. Asylum of the Daleks ruined the Daleks for me. Which was a shame, because from what I remember of the marketing I’m fairly sure it was supposed to do the exact opposite. It was meant to bring the Daleks back – make them scary again, while at the same time pleasing Dalek fans by using old models. Unfortunately, it failed at both of these goals on a pretty catastrophic level, and set a trend that would run for the rest of the series all the way up until The Time of the Doctor, at the very least (The Time of the Doctor being the most recent episode at the time of writing). In this article, I’d like to examine exactly what went wrong with the episode, the Daleks, and how Moffat or future writers could fix it. Lack of threat Quite a big part of being scary comes from being threatening. If you don’t pose any real threat then why on earth should we be scared of you? Well, in Asylum of the Daleks, I wasn’t scared of the Daleks. Not even close. In fact, I found them really quite funny and in some cases, very cute! I mean, the Oswin Dalek “They hate you sooo muchhh” – that line coming from a Dalek is just adorable. Then there’s the spinny Dalek when Amy has the hallucination, I just want to hug it! It must be getting really dizzy, I can picture a little Dalek mutant with his eyeball spinning around as he tries to get control of himself. Both of these scenes are meant to be dark and frightening, but they’re just not. But the scene that really ticked me off was the one with Rory, stuck in a room with a bunch of insane Daleks. That should have been one of the scariest scenes of Series 7, but alas, the ‘powerslide through a slowly closing door’ cliche prevails over all. All the Daleks have Stormtrooper aim, Rory manages to roll and dodge like some kind of ninja, and the whole thing is just straight out of a Michael Bay film (and a bad one at that!). But this problem goes back further – all the way back to Series 5! Have a quick think to yourself; since the Paradigm Daleks were introduced in Victory of the Daleks, how many people have the Daleks actually killed on screen? I mean killed in the classic Dalek way, with the extermination effect and everything. The victims also have to stay dead, so the Doctor’s extermination in The Big Bang doesn’t count. I’m counting two. Two. Two! And both of them were from Victory of the Daleks, both being nameless canon fodder. Wow. Plotholes ‘Plothole’ seems to have become a bit of a dirty word recently, but it’s really not. Plotholes are a pretty good judge of how well a story is written, as the more of them there are the less well thought out the story tends to be, and the flimsier it becomes. This would probably explain why I like to joke that Asylum of the Daleks doesn’t have a story at all, because the plotholes rip through it like a machine gun. Firstly, I’m fairly sure Skaro was destroyed – twice! In Remembrance of the Daleks and the Time War. It’s also very illogical that the Doctor would go there in the first place and still be surprised when it’s a trap. Secondly, Dalek missiles cannot penetrate the Asylum’s shields, but a random starliner can? Those are some pretty crappy shields, and some even crapper missiles. Then, Oswin has the cure for the Daleks in intensive care – just make them forget about the Doctor! If that’s what’s wrong with them, and it’s that easy to make them forget, then why don’t the Daleks just cure everything in intensive care by making them forget? On the topic of the whole Oswin thing, why are the insane, angry Daleks connected to the Pathweb in the first place? Finally, and this one’s the real nail in the coffin, the forcefield can only be disabled from inside the Asylum… where the inmates are. Just think about that for a second. It’s in the one place where the ‘prison warden’ can’t disable the forcefield, but the inmates can. They’ve locked the insane, murdering lunatics in their cell with the key. Yeah, these Daleks are pretty stupid. Breaking Promises Hey, remember when there was all that buzz about how the Doctor Who team had basically raided the BBC warehouses to dust off all the old Dalek models for use in the new episode, and that massive cover shot of all the Daleks, and Matt saying how much he loved the sixties Daleks and all that? Oh yeah, those were the days. Unfortunately, all that hype was for nothing, as the Dalek everyone really wanted to see back (the Special Weapons Dalek, in case you were wondering) got literally a second of screen time. Wonderful. Thanks Moffat for your brilliant nostalgia trip. There’s a scene which particularly annoyed me, and that was the intensive care scene. All of those Daleks are from classic series episodes, and they even go to the trouble of naming the planets, just to be sure that fans knew these were the real deal. Unfortunately, the team decided it would be a good idea not to actually use the classic Daleks from those stories, and instead plonked in some bronze Daleks. This is a literal example of Moffat just googling some classic series names and then putting little to no effort into actually going all the way with the reference. I know this sounds minor and nitpicky, but it really annoyed me on first watch. You’ve gone to the trouble of rooting out all of these Daleks and getting them on set, you’ve got fans excited, why not use the darn things when the situation calls for it? Breaking Continuity This episode breaks Dalek continuity more times than I can count. I’m going to focus on the Dalek Parliament for this segment, but bear in mind that there are little things scattered throughout this episode that just cripple any chance I have of enjoying it. So, Dalek Parliament. What? Since when did Daleks have a Parliament? Weren’t they supposed to have an Emperor or something? Since the last one died I presumed they’d replace him rather than create a parliament and a Prime Minister. I’m pretty sure Daleks are all interconnected by the Pathweb anyway, so why is there any need for a parliament? Not to mention that the Dalek Prime Minister looks awful, it’s just some random tube with a horrible over-lit Dalek mutant inside. But let’s move on to what was actually said in this scene: “Save us.” So the Daleks go from hating and desperately wanting to kill the Doctor, in some cases even fearing him… to this. I don’t have a problem with the Daleks using the Doctor to their advantage, but did they have to do it in such a pathetic and pitiful way as to beg for his help? “It is offensive to us to extinguish such divine hatred.” Anyone remember Victory of the Daleks when the new Dalek Paradigm destroyed the old models due to their inferiority? Because Moffat certainly didn’t… “Does it surprise you to know the Daleks have a concept of beauty?” In case it wasn’t already obvious, in Doomsday the Daleks mention that they have no concept of elegance. I’m fairly sure elegance and beauty are pretty much the same. “Perhaps that is why we have never been able to kill you.” Okay, this lines actually kinda cool. It’s built upon completely nonsensical rubbish, and it’s not expanded upon at all, but hey, credit where credit is due. “The Asylum must be cleansed!” Hang on, I thought hatred was beautiful! This parliament is already contradicting itself. It’s like the Clegg and Cameron of Daleks… How to fix it Good question. Firstly, the Daleks need to be actually threatening. The easiest way to do this is by making them actually exterminate people, so I’d recommend a big massive two-parter with a Dalek war of some kind with lots of supporting characters who can be developed then killed off. Have the Doctor escape just by the skin of his teeth, and have the Daleks win in some way. Secondly, we need to fix all these continuity problems. Give a definite answer to all of these running questions so that no writer ever gets confused again and accidentally ends up doing something stupid. Finally, don’t make promises you cant keep! Well, that’s that. I have to say that I don’t like hating episodes, it’s just that Asylum of the Daleks makes it so easy to hate it that I just can’t resist. I hope you enjoyed reading this article as much as I enjoyed writing it, please leave your thoughts in the comments below. Thanks! from http://tieba.baidu.com/mo/q/checkurl?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.doctorwhotv.co.uk%2Funpopular-opinion-asylum-of-the-daleks-62371.htm&urlrefer=99f6426652d1b93ade1f4c2a337fda5f Original Content Copyright © 2005-2014 Doctor Who TV. All Rights Reserved. Doctor Who is © BBC.
1 下一页