Wh60101213 Wh60101213
关注数: 45 粉丝数: 79 发帖数: 4,787 关注贴吧数: 30
我有个新锐的想法 高速度工业化所采取的形式是猛烈压缩工人和农民的消费来实现“原始积累”,正象资本主义原始积累是以加剧人民贫困为基础的。但是,除了得到大规模外援的情况外,任何加速积累,只有通过增加生产者没有消费掉的那一部分社会剩余产品,才能实现。不论这种现象是在哪一种社会里出现,情况总是这样。这完全不是什么资本主义所固有的特点。在现代资本主义经济中,“经济计划化”,国家与经济的日益合而为一,对神圣的私有权偶有侵犯,这都是在 有利于垄断资本的情况下进行的,目的在于维护和保证垄断集团的利润。国家与经济的合而为一,实际上只不过是垄断集团利用国家机器,全面控制经济而已。而在苏联,国家对经济的管理,生产资料私有制的取消,经济与国家的合而为一,是通过 剥夺和消灭作为阶级的资产阶级而实现的。现代资本主义把自己的发展趋势推到了极限的资本主义。苏联社会则是对资本主义社会主要特点的毁灭和否定。 辩护者们竭力强调苏联没有生产资料私有制,生产力和人民的技术与文化的一般水平不断地迅速提高。确实,这一切证明苏联不是一个资本主义国家。但要是从这里面得出结论说:当存在着历史利益和有时甚至是眼前利益都相对立的阶级——工人阶级和农民阶级——的时候,当社会不平等大大加剧的时候,当生产力的发展水平仍低于最先进的资本主义国家所达到的水平时,就已经是一个社会主义国家了,那么这种结论却可能是谬误的。
······························· ····················································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································
1 下一页