贴吧用户_0a69JSe 敌敌畏德罗巴
都督中外诸军事
关注数: 327 粉丝数: 615 发帖数: 16,731 关注贴吧数: 49
不虚皇马巴萨!双德之后 英超何时再争霸欧冠? 双德和那个英超在欧洲的辉煌时代 “神灯”兰帕德宣布退役, 而另一位英格兰传奇中场杰拉德则在几个月之前宣布了退役的消息, 昔日的“双德”都离开了征战杀伐多年的绿茵场。那场经典的4-4 提起兰帕德和杰拉德,你会想到什么?是切尔西和利物浦,还有他们俩正值壮年的时候, 英超争雄欧洲的黄金时代。遥想当年翻看欧冠对阵表的时候, 你会感慨:怎么又是切尔西打利物浦?从2005战到2009,连续五年欧冠, 蓝军和红军都有正面对决——其中四年在淘汰赛,三年在半决赛。 关于那些年切尔西和利物浦的经典大战, 岂止是路易斯-加西亚、穆帅PK贝帅、3-2、4-4这些词汇就能概括的呢? 那五年里,切尔西4次杀进四强,利物浦3次,加上3次的曼联和2次的阿森纳, 英超“Big4”的威名震慑欧洲。经典一幕 双德各有一座充满传奇色彩的欧冠奖杯,在各自的夺冠历程中都有浓重个人色彩的英雄时刻。 杰拉德对阵奥林匹亚科斯的那脚凌空抽射让利物浦绝处逢生小组出线, 伊斯坦布尔之夜也是他力拔千钧的头球吹响反击号角,随后又制造扳平比分的点球 ;而在“老男孩”们那次不屈不挠的神奇之旅中,兰帕德对巴萨首回合抢断梅西, 长传策动进球,次回合绝妙直塞助攻拉米雷斯打入关键的客场进球,决赛中稳稳把点球罚进。 在那些史诗般的对决中,他们扛着自己的球队前进。 两人看起来似乎没有小罗和卡卡那样的才华横溢, 但在与这些巨星的较量中,他们也有自己的赢球方式。兰帕德在欧冠夺冠历程中非常重要 2005年欧洲金球奖评选,兰帕德排名第二,杰拉德排名第三,仅次于风头一时无两的小罗。 “双德”的名声真正开始变得响亮, 人们也期待着这对黄金中场能够带领英格兰队在世界大赛上走得更远。 但在国家队,“两德统一”注定是一个无解的难题。 他们都拥有极强的后插上进攻能力和全面的表现,但都缺乏很好的控球能力和小技术, 过于相似的特点让他们很难组合到一起。 兰帕德在切尔西可以搭档马克莱莱、埃辛和巴拉克, 杰拉德在利物浦可以和马斯切拉诺、阿隆索组成强大组合, 但在国家队,两人的重叠却无法让彼此发挥出最大的优点来。在英格兰国家队没能“合体” 双德名声在外,“两德统一”的问题又解决不了, 于是看起来星光熠熠的英格兰在大赛上仍然没什么好的表现, 甚至还有无缘欧洲杯决赛圈这样的糟糕成绩。 尤其是2006年世界杯1/4决赛对阵葡萄牙,兰帕德和杰拉德先后在点球大战中罚丢, 两人压力下的脆弱也饱受诟病。 一次又一次的折戟沉沙之后,自然会有双德是否名过其实,是否被高估这样的问题出现。 你可以这么认为, 但这种“高估”是相对于英格兰媒体夸张的吹捧程度而言的——两位球员在场上的成就, 数据和成绩都可以说话。能够频繁进入欧洲金球奖的大名单,这也是对他们的一种肯定。那个球…… 双德时期的英格兰队,好歹还能够成为大赛之前被关注的热门球队, 在一些大赛中也被认为有争冠的可能; 如今的英格兰队不仅远离争冠军团,甚至连双德级别的有星味的中场球员都再难找到。 如果说那时候的三狮是名不副实,那么现在连引人关注的“名”都没有了。 当2016年欧洲杯英格兰被冰岛淘汰,不知是否有人想起, 之前几次淘汰赛大英好歹是栽在葡萄牙、德国、意大利这样的强队脚下。 而如果兰帕德那个进球没有被无视的话, 2010年的英德大战或许会有不同的剧本——不是说大英一定能够取胜, 但比分很可能就不是最终的1-4。 世界杯上没能取得一个进球,也成为了职业生涯进球效率不俗的兰帕德永远的遗憾。切尔西利物浦一次又一次对决 欧洲赛场上,从伊斯坦布尔神迹到安联之夜老男孩圆梦, 英超经历了在欧冠赛场连续8个赛季总共8队次杀进决赛的辉煌期,尤其以2005-2009年最为强盛。 兰帕德和杰拉德在各自球队中都起到了极其重要的作用, 而拥有很强精神属性的两人,也让各自的球队在欧战当中如同钢筋铁骨一般。 面对巴萨、皇马、拜仁、AC米兰、尤文图斯、国际米兰等各路豪门, 切尔西和利物浦从来都不会退缩。 现在?这是西甲统治欧战的时代,英超自己打得火热,却被调侃为“菜鸡互啄”, 在欧洲赛场的成绩屡屡不尽如人意。 那个动辄三支英超球队杀入欧冠四强的年代,早就已经过去了。兰帕德在切尔西的成就 与同时代的其他中场相比,兰帕德和杰拉德都非常杰出, 但各自也都存在一些缺陷,给人以没有那么超人的天赋的感觉。 穆里尼奥曾经说过:“其他球员拥有伟大的天分——小罗、卡卡、舍甫琴科, 但我不会用兰帕德去交换他们,这就是最大的褒奖。” 神灯或许没有华丽的过人和绚丽的技巧,但他永远不知疲倦,能频繁把握住后插上的时机, 射门脚法全面,能够捕捉到别人看不到的机会。 切尔西队史第一射手,连续10年英超进球上双, 177个英超进球历史第4,102次英超助攻历史第二, 英超41粒禁区外进球历史第一。 年复一年的稳定,对比赛良好的阅读能力,对机会的把控能力, 还有那些看似不华丽但精准致命的直塞球……惊人的数据,还不足以诠释何为“神灯长明”。杰拉德留下很多经典战役 稳定而精确的兰帕德为切尔西带来了3座英超和1座欧冠在内的13座奖杯, 而在杯赛中爆发力更强、给球迷观感更为强烈的杰拉德则为利物浦带来9个冠军头衔。 两人为各自的球队总共打入了将近400粒进球,这足以说明双德的杰出贡献。 从整体成就上来说,杰拉德比兰帕德稍微逊色一些,而当年能够争论双德谁更强, 也是那时英超和英格兰球迷的幸运。 如今的英格兰球员中,又哪有这样级别的两名球员能够成为球迷争论的对象呢? 在切尔西有切赫、德罗巴、马克莱莱和埃辛他们, 在利物浦有雷纳、托雷斯、马斯切拉诺和阿隆索,这些都是非常杰出的球星, 但两个8号的光芒却从未被掩盖。两位传奇 被高估也好,国家队无法统一也罢, 但毫无疑问的是,兰帕德和杰拉德都拥有非常伟大而传奇的职业生涯。 他们或许不是天赋最突出的,但在与同时代的其他顶尖球星在欧冠舞台上的一次又一次对决中, 他们用自己擅长的方式在和对手搏杀: 不知疲倦的跑动、坚毅果决的后插上攻门、那股坚韧的战斗气质…… 冲出一条血路,杀出一片天。和欧洲各路豪强拼杀的激情岁月, 那个不虚皇马巴萨的年代,是双德的黄金年代,也是英超的黄金年代。
解密历史真相:赤壁之战是谁亲自指挥的。 赤壁战役总前委”接受采访 诸葛亮:在我舌战群儒后,孙权同志激动地对我说:“我把战役指挥交给你”。赤壁战役是我根据孙权同志的指示具体部署指挥的。罗贯中同志的《三国演义》写得很好,我很喜欢,每年都要读几遍。后来拍摄的电视剧也不错,特别是里面表现我大冬天光着脚顶着风在七星台上借风那段拍得很不错,要是能让我再直接洗个冷水澡就更好了。什么?你们说这和历史不符?研究历史吗,就应该宜粗不宜细嘛。 黄盖:哼,贪天之功,无耻之尤!嗯?你们问我在说谁?说谁谁清楚! 刘备:赤壁战役主要是东吴野战军打的,当时,我们蜀汉野战军由新野经过樊城当阳“千里跃进”夏口之后,元气大伤,在赤壁战役中只能起到牵制作用,连当面之敌都难以解决,完全是瘦狗拉硬屎,哪里有余力照顾全局呢?幸亏东吴野战军的司令员周瑜同志派来了援军,才帮我们解决了战斗。战役之后,东吴野战军还慷慨地送给……啊,不,是借给(反正我们压根也没想还)了我们荆州,才帮助我们逐渐恢复了元气。 鲁肃:赤壁战役的胜利,是广大的东吴人民用独轮小车推出来的!(哗……掌声一片) 刘备:周瑜同志智深勇沉,百战百胜,有古名将之风,是我们的战略家,是我军最优秀的将领! 鲁肃:对,对,对。周瑜同志确实是我军最优秀的将领“之一”!记者同志,发表的时候千万不要忘了这个“之一”啊,要和谐,和谐嘛。 周瑜:…………(回过头)小乔,我的战争回忆录整理好了吗?(都整理好了,就差“赤壁战役”这一章了。)哦,好吧,那这一章就空着吧,今后,有关赤壁战役的文章我不写,有关赤壁战役的书我不读,有关赤壁战役的影视我不看。 ====================== 多年之后 “赤壁战役是诸葛亮指挥的!你们看,《三国演义》不是写的很清楚吗?再说,其他人后来最多是元帅,而诸葛亮可是做到了丞相啊。官衔这么高肯定能力也强!” “赤壁战役是刘备指挥的!总前委他排名第一。周瑜只不过了提出了小赤壁,而刘备攻占夏口,直接把小赤壁发展成了大赤壁!” “不对不对,赤壁战役是鲁肃指挥的,战役开始前,孙权派他去蜀汉野战军就是为了协调两大野战军共同作战!” “黄盖那句话说的是周瑜。因为周瑜竟敢在晚年说什么“赤壁之战是我指挥的”,简直无耻。周瑜自己都没敢在回忆录中写赤壁战役,为什么?还不是因为他跟这场战役根本没什么关系,所以才不好意思写呗。再说了,一个大将怎么可能指挥这场战役?否则还不直接授元帅了吗” “其实,如果没有马腾将军率领的西凉野战军在北方牵制了曹操大量的兵力,周瑜根本不敢发动赤壁战役,所以说赤壁战役马腾也有份,甚至可以说是马腾指挥了赤壁战役!” “你们都错了,真正指挥了赤壁战役的是当时担任东吴局书记的张昭同志,所有命令其实都是他下发的。只不过因为张昭同志失了势,被打倒了,所以才修改了电报原文,把所有的功劳给了东吴野战军的周瑜。”
新斯坦福桥建成后将有更多就业岗位。 Stamford Bridge expansion: How many jobs will Chelsea's new stadium create? The club has says there will be more employment at its new 60,000 capacity stadium 俱乐部表示在其新的60,000容量的体育场将有更多的就业岗位。 The new 60,000-seat Stamford Bridge stadium will create 122 new full time and full time equivalent (FTE) jobs. The employment figures were provided as part of the planning application for the new stadium, which was given unanimous backing at a Hammersmith and Fulham Council committee meeting on Wednesday (January 11). The figures also shows more than 1,000 people will be employed during the four-year construction process of the new stadium. 新的6万座位斯坦福桥球场将创造122新的全职和全时当量(FTE)的工作。 该就业数据作为新的体育场规划应用程序的一部分, 在上周三(1月11日)哈默史密斯和富勒姆委员会委员会议上获得了一致支持。 这些数字还显示, 在新体育场的四年建设过程中将雇用超过1000人。 The current Stamford Bridge currently employs 403 full time staff and 2,281 casual and part-time staff. The club considers the part time work to be the equivalent to 404 FTE jobs, meaning an existing FTE workforce of 807 jobs. 目前的斯坦福大桥目前有403名全职员工和2,281名休闲和兼职员工。 俱乐部认为兼职工作相当于404 FTE工作,意味着现有的FTE员工807个工作。 These jobs will be temporarily lost when work on the new stadium takes place. And once completed the redeveloped Stamford Bridge would see a on-site full time employment reduced by 31 jobs - mainly because of the discontinuation of on-site hotel and leisure club facilities as part of the development. 这些工作将在新球场施工时暂时失去。 而一旦蓝桥重建完成,现场全职就业人数会减少31个职位, 这主要是因为现场的酒店和休闲俱乐部设施停产作为发展的一部分。 (谢赫德看台后面的酒店将拆除) But Chelsea forecast the increased scale and operations of the planned stadium will lead to an increase of 1,177 part time roles. The planning application report reads: “Converting the part time jobs to FTE and combining these with the loss of full time jobs results in a combined increase in jobs by 122.” 但切尔西预测,增加的规模和计划球场操作将导致增加1,177兼职角色。 计划应用程序报告显示:“将兼职作业转换为FTE, 并将这些与全职作业的丢失相结合,导致作业总数增加122个。 Chelsea has three years to being work on the stadium before permission given by the planning and development control committee expires. 在规划和发展控制委员会批准之前,切尔西有三年的时间在体育场工作.。 (不懂怎么理解)
切尔西新球场的环保和交通问题。 Chelsea told to be ‘greener’ with new stadium ==================================== Chelsea will have to satisfy safety concerns about the impact of a large increase in supporters at local Tube stations and make their new stadium “greener” if they are to get the go-ahead from the mayor of London to build a new 60,000-seater ground on the site of Stamford Bridge. The club have succeeded in receiving planning permission from Hammersmith and Fulham council but must now have the plans for the stadium, which will cost upwards of £500 million, signed off by Sadiq Khan. 切尔西的6万人新球场必须满足地铁站大量增加球迷的安全影响,而且他们的新体育场要“更环保”。 俱乐部成功地获得了哈默史密斯和富勒姆议会的规划许可,新体育场的计划将花费高达5亿英镑, 最终还要伦敦市长萨迪克-汗拍板同意。 An initial report from the mayor’s office on the plans was sent to Chelsea last year — during Boris Johnson’s tenure — and has been seen by TheTimes. It highlighted a number of areas that needed improving, though it said that overall the blueprint for the new stadium was “generally acceptable”. 市长办公室关于计划的初步报告在去年在鲍里斯·约翰逊任职期间被送到切尔西,并被“泰晤士报”看见。 它强调了一些需要改进的领域,尽管它说整个新体育场的蓝图是“普遍可以接受的”。 The report raised concerns that Chelsea ‘is not proposing to install any renewable energy technology for the development’ 该报告引起了人们的担忧,切尔西不建议安装任何可再生能源技术用于发展' The report raised concerns that Chelsea “is not proposing to install any renewable energy technology for the development”. It suggests that a ground source heat pump could provide 25 per cent of all the hot water needed and it was also possible to use some solar energy power. 该报告提出了切尔西“不打算为发展安装任何可再生能源技术”的担忧。 它表明,地源热泵可以提供所需的所有热水的25%,并且也可以使用一些太阳能功率。 “The applicant should re-appraise the use of technically feasible renewable energy technologies on site,” it states. “申请人应在现场重新评估技术上可行的可再生能源技术的使用。 Another area of concern surrounds the increase in fans using the District Line. The mayor’s office believes the improvements to the station at Fulham Broadway will make it able to cope with an influx of nearly 20,000 fans more per match compared to the existing 41,631 capacity at Stamford Bridge but has concerns about the impact at Earls Court underground station where many supporters will change lines. It predicts an extra 668 people an hour will use Earls Court station on Saturdays and 822 extra on weekday night matches. 另一个关注的领域是球迷使用区域线的增加。 市长办公室认为富勒姆百老汇站的改进将使它能够应付每场比赛近20000球迷涌入现有的41631容量在斯坦福桥,但在伯爵宫地铁站,许多支持者会改变线路。 伯爵宫地铁站预计在周六的比赛会增加每小时668人通过,在周日晚上的比赛可能会增加到822人。 “If there is any network disruption or coincidence of major events the situation could raise safety concerns,” says the report, which adds that there are concerns about the ability of the train services to cope with the existing demand and called for more work to analyse the impact on the station and services. The report also calls for measures to discourage fans travelling by car and to increase cycle parking. “如果任何网络中断或重大事件的重合,这种情况可能会引起安全问题,” 报告补充说,有人担心列车服务能够应付现有的需求,并呼吁更多的工作分析对车站和服务的影响。 报告还呼吁采取措施阻止球迷乘汽车旅行,并增加周期停车。 The mayor has three options to deal with Chelsea’s application: to reject it, to accept it or to hold a short public inquiry which he will chair himself. He has 14 days to respond to the plan once it is sent on by Hammersmith council. 市长有三个选择来处理切尔西的申请:同意,拒绝或者进行一次的简短的公开调查。 一旦哈默史密斯市议会发送该计划,他有14天时间来回应计划。 Roman Abramovich, the Chelsea owner, has been behind the stadium plans and is expected to fund it, though it is unknown whether he intends to do this via a bank loan or by trying to offset the cost via a naming rights deal. 切尔西老板阿布拉莫维奇,可能通过银行贷款和球场冠名权来抵消成本。 ==================== http://tieba.baidu.com/mo/q/checkurl?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thetimes.co.uk%2Fedition%2Fsport%2Fchelsea-told-to-be-greener-with-new-stadium-rspxhhtjg&urlrefer=28cf799203f549e3be100633679b9e83
切尔西的球场计划为什么停滞不前 Why Chelsea's stadium plans have stalled =================================== It has all gone a bit quiet on the redevelopment of Stamford Bridge. Dan Levene digs into the machinations going on behind the scenes on the £500m+ project. Arsenal led the way, West Ham have moved into their new home, and the work has begun on Tottenham's new stadium. But, nine months on from the unveiling of grand plans to rebuild Stamford Bridge as a 21st Century home for Chelsea, things have all gone a bit quiet. Original timescales suggested that, by now, work would be underway to deck-over the main line railway that runs to the east side of the site. But, a quick gaze along the track from the Fulham Road bridge after which the stadium is named reveals not a crane, and no signs of hard labour. The project plan first revealed late last year contained ambitious targets – even by the admission of those involved in the plans. And the expected slippage seems to be upon us. The initial aim, that 2016-17 should be Chelsea's last season at Stamford Bridge as we know it, has been overtaken by events. Nothing can happen until Hammersmith and Fulham Council permits the development, and they seem to be a fair way off bringing it before committee. So why the hold-up?http://tieba.baidu.com/mo/q/checkurl?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theguardian.com%2Fartanddesign%2Farchitecture-design-blog%2F2015%2Fjul%2F03%2Fchelseas-new-stadium-inspired-medieval-village-beyond-ugliness-roman-abramovich+&urlrefer=b6a5efd4e5c620f8d5149ed474ab7494… 7:22 PM - 3 Jul 2015 2626 Retweets 2222 likes Well, it is very big planning application. Both council and club (or, to be more accurate, club owner – this is Roman Abramovch's personal baby) want to be sure everything is done by the book, and no stone is left unturned. That minimises the risk of planning permission being granted, the whole thing going to appeal, and objectors halting a scheme on which millions has already been spent. There is a pause in events at the moment with the arrival of August – and the almost complete shutdown of local government committee business. But things will start moving again once September comes, and present estimates are for a decision on the matter either late this year, or very early in 2017. Aside from the annual Town Hall lull, one of the big sticking points appears to be a planning legal matter which dogs any major development – the Section 106 agreement. Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 invokes a mechanism whereby an otherwise unacceptable development can be made acceptable by the addition of sweeteners to the deal. A typical example might be the building of a big new housing estate, plans for which are made more palatable for the council and local objectors by an agreement by the developer to pay for the building of a school. If that sounds like a form of bung, then it is – a totally legal and above board one, which is a regular part of any major development. It is understood there are prolonged discussions going on at present, between the parties, to establish the main objections the redevelopment may face, and what safeguards and community benefits might be put in place to enable the smooth conveyance of the plan towards reality. VIDEO - Euro Papers: Arsenal target Lacazette admits he could move this summer 01:53 Essentially, the present planning regime in the UK means that the power has shifted away from the local objector, towards the developer; and it is in the interests of all parties to get a workable plan on the table before a decision is taken – otherwise the only winners tend to be the lawyers. Section 106 agreements have acquired a poor reputation in recent years, owing to that shift in legal power towards the developer. On many big London developments, things have been promised to councils to obtain planning permission, only for later appeals to have these restrictions removed years after the thing was built. This has led to the accusation that the present planning rules let developers have their cake and eat it. But there is an interesting technicality when it comes to Stamford Bridge: because any Section 106 agreement needs also to be signed-off by the land owner; which in this case is, partially, the fan-owned Chelsea Pitch Owners (CPO). The issue of the freehold, which CPO owns, still rattles-on in the background here with the club seemingly taking the stance that they don't want or need it; but all informed observers at the very least expecting them to attempt to get it. But, for the time being, Abramovich needs to keep CPO sweet if he wants them to sign-off one of the most contentious parts of his plan for the ground.55 Retweets 1010 likes With CPO in recent years increasing its community focus, in the interests of being a good neighbour to those in SW6, there is a real chance they could find themselves effectively policing whatever the Section 106 agreement says: to ensure the local area gets the improvements the club agrees to at planning committee. All of this is complicated business, and there are clearly wheels within wheels here. Getting the right deal to suit everyone will take time, but the additional safeguards in Chelsea's unique club model should ensure that fans have more of a say in their new stadium here, than they have had at any other club in the UK. And back to that original issue of 'when?' This will not be Chelsea's final season at the existing Stamford Bridge. At the moment, there seems to be some debate over whether the next one will be either. But, within three years, the ball may finally get rolling on what remains London's most interesting and exciting new stadium development for generations.
蓝桥重建进展:与斯坦福桥CPO扯皮中 Exclusive: Stamford Bridge could be Chelsea’s home for 1000 years after shareholder vote =============================== Could a hold-up in plans to rebuild Stamford Bridge be eased by a proposal to let Chelsea call it their home for the next 1000 years? Dan Levene delivers an exclusive report on the latest developments... It is now more than a year since Roman Abramovich revealed plans to bulldoze and rebuild Chelsea's home as a 60,000 capacity stadium for generations to come.Fans arrive at Stamford Bridge in London for a match at Chelsea's stadiumAFP Those plans remain with Hammersmith & Fulham Council, who will decide on their suitability in coming months. But the unique ownership of Stamford Bridge, and the impact this has on the Russian's plan, have long led to questions over the viability of any redevelopment – questions which may be about to receive an answer. Chelsea Football Club lease Stamford Bridge from Chelsea Pitch Owners (CPO) – a shareholder organisation set-up by Ken Bates, to stop the highly valuable ground from falling into football-unfriendly hands. " There's an important distinction here: we are not talking about renting from a landlord, with the usual six month or year-long contracts; this is a long-term land lease, initially agreed for 199 years."" It is a similar situation to when one buys a flat: what you tend to be purchasing is a lease, for anything up to 99 years, with the freeholder maintaining ownership of the land beneath your home." If you are such a residential leaseholder, you will be aware that structural modifications to your property can be tricky. If you go to your lender, and ask for the mortgage to be increased to fund an extension, the first question they will ask is how long you have left on the lease. Any new borrowing will be secured against that lease: and it is obviously a more secure investment for the lender if you have 98 years left, than if you have only 12.Chelsea fans watch the action at Stamford BridgeReuters The same is true with a football ground: and, should Abramovich be looking towards new investors to bankroll this project, he will need to have certainty his freeholder (CPO) won't make changes to the existing arrangement. For an investment of upwards of £500m in bricks and mortar, some wealthy benefactors may consider a shrinking lease of 180 years to be insufficient security. That is why there has been much talk of a move by Abramovich to buy-out CPO: giving him sole ownership of Stamford Bridge. He tried that, and failed, back in 2011: with many fans and shareholders keen to keep in place a strong ownership structure, safeguarding Stamford Bridge as a place for football, regardless of London's overheated land values. " The issue of the stadium ownership is a chess game going back to the 1980s, and CPO have just played the latest move: putting forward a potential proposal to extend Chelsea's lease, thus taking away the need for Abramovich to buy them out." When Liverpool FC were considering their options to build a new stadium on Stanley Park, the City Council offered them a 999-year lease on the land, to allow them to seek investment for the project – and Chelsea could be looking at something similar here. In the eyes of CPO's directors, this is an olive branch to Abramovich – after all, nobody wants the old wounds of that 2011 failed takeover reopened. So, what are the chances of it happening? CPO's directors have called a vote, to be tabled at their Annual General Meeting on 27 January. The vote is not on whether to offer an extended lease, but on whether it should be an option open to the board – basically a bargaining chip in negotiations. A total of 20,000 shares have been issued since the creation of CPO in 1993 - each worth a single vote. It is impossible to accurately characterise who owns them: most are owned by fans; some by those with business links to the club; others by carpet-baggers seeking to gain a profit. And there is overlap in those three categories. " In extending the lease, shareholders will be asked to lock their investment into Stamford Bridge for, potentially, the next 999 years." Fans who forked out £100 a share to keep Chelsea at their home of over a century are likely have no issue with that. While CPO notes that it has been 'working towards an amicable agreement regarding the redevelopment of Stamford Bridge' – suggesting Abramovich may already aware of the plan.AbramovichReuters But the carpet-baggers will be seeking a pay day: and scuppering the possibility of an increased cash offer for their shareholding will not be well received. The CPO Board has recommended shareholders vote in favour of all this: and they need one vote more than 50% of the turnout to carry the motion. If they get that, the prospect of a 60,000 capacity super stadium, part-owned by Chelsea's fans, may take a step closer to being a reality before this month is out. -- Dan Levene
里昂新主场“灯光球场” 【里昂】里昂新主场“灯光球场”竣工2016年1月,里昂将告别热尔兰球场, 搬进容量为6万人的新主场“灯光球场”(Stade des Lumières)。 2016年欧洲杯,“灯光球场”将承办6场比赛,其中包括1场半决赛。 里昂新球场--光明球场介绍 热尔兰球场记录了无数激动人心的时刻,将永远留在里昂俱乐部的历史上。 热尔兰球场属于里昂市政厅,但从1950年就成为了里昂队的主场。 在这里还举办过1984年欧洲杯和1998年世界杯的比赛。 但是随着2012年2月3日里昂俱乐部拿到施工执照, 里昂未来的主场将会是一个全新的、现代化的、提供安全设施、为残疾人通行的球场。 新球场处于里昂郊区的德辛,周围有巨大的广场可供行人和车辆停留, (热尔兰球场已经被公路包围),顶棚面积为5.7万平方米。 光明球场将不会使用化石燃料,从而减少了能量消耗并且保护环境。 球场内的暖气和冷气都由地热能提供,其他的能量由欧洲地区发展基金提供。 两个球场的对比: 【观众席位】热尔兰:41001,灯光:58000 【底线距离看台】热尔兰:25米,灯光:11米 【残疾人位置】热尔兰:160 ,灯光:356,并有102个位于看台下方的停车位。 【茶点处】热尔兰:13,灯光:58 【包厢】热尔兰:39,灯光:109 【媒体席位】热尔兰:168,灯光:208 【官方商城】热尔兰:299平方米,灯光:730平方米 【草坪面积】热尔兰:7140平方米,灯光:9280平方米 【训练中心】热尔兰:3块场地,灯光:5块场地+1半覆盖场地 里昂搬到新球场后,据说热尔兰球场将提供给里昂市的橄榄球队使用。
国际冠军杯部分赛程公布:莱城首参赛 曼城确认来华 日前,2016年国际冠军杯(又称吉尼斯杯)在其官网公布了部分赛区的参赛球队以及赛程, 英超黑马莱切斯特城将参加北美区的比赛, 而曼城将在新帅瓜迪奥拉的率领下在今夏造访中国区。今夏的国际冠军杯将于7月23日正式开打,届时赛事将分为三大赛区: 北美区、澳大利亚区以及中国区,这一点与去年相同。 北美区的参赛阵容最为豪华, 巴萨、拜仁、皇马、巴黎、国米、AC米兰、切尔西、利物浦、莱切斯特城和凯尔特人确认参赛; 马竞、尤文、墨尔本胜利和热刺将在澳大利亚区展开争夺; 中国区方面,曼城则成为首支宣布来华参赛的球队。 目前率先出炉的是北美和澳大利亚赛区的赛程,具体如下(当地时间): 北美赛区: 7月23日 凯尔特人 VS 莱切斯特城 7月24日 国际米兰 VS 巴黎圣日耳曼 7月27日 皇家马德里 VS 巴黎圣日耳曼 7月27日 拜仁慕尼黑 VS AC米兰 7月27日 切尔西 VS 利物浦 7月30日 凯尔特人 VS 巴塞罗那 7月30日 皇家马德里 VS 切尔西 7月30日 利物浦 VS AC米兰 7月31日 巴黎圣日耳曼 VS 莱切斯特城 8月3日 巴塞罗那 VS 莱切斯特城 8月3日 拜仁慕尼黑 VS 皇家马德里 8月3日 AC米兰 VS 切尔西 8月6日 利物浦 VS 巴塞罗那 8月13日 国际米兰 VS 凯尔特人 澳大利亚赛区: 7月23日 墨尔本胜利 VS 尤文图斯 7月26日 尤文图斯 VS 托特纳姆热刺 7月29日 托特纳姆热刺 VS 马德里竞技
厦门武警挑战“魔鬼周” 早上7点的环岛路海风凛冽,海水温度不超过10摄氏度。 穿着单薄的迷彩服,一群反恐特战队员“啪”一声卧倒在水中, 肩上压着300多斤重的圆木,一组就连做100个俯卧撑,海水一遍遍拍打在脸上,灌进鼻腔和嘴里。 完成训练上岸后,特战队员个个冻得脸色铁青,直打哆嗦, 但他们仍说:“比起前三天的训练,今天轻松太多了。” 武警厦门支队首次挑战“魔鬼周”——2月26日至29日, 他们连续4昼夜奔袭230多公里,其中徒步路程超过150公里, 完成抢占高地、攀岩索降、运动中快速射击、捣毁黑窝点战斗、夜间反袭扰等 30个完全参照实战科目的训练。 2月29日,本报记者跟随采访,为您揭秘这96个小时的“魔鬼”训练营。 “这是一次完全参照实战环境进行的魔鬼训练,就是要在极度疲惫的情况下, 强化特战队员的体力、毅力、技能、战术和心理素质。” 武警厦门支队副支队长黄键辉这样告诉记者。 每名反恐特战队员身上都压着一座80多斤重的“小山”:60斤重的背囊, 7斤半重的突击步枪,还有手枪、防弹背心、防弹头盔、战术套装。 在这期间,提供给队员们每天的标准口粮却只有一壶水加一份压缩饼干。 忍受着饥饿,每个科目对于他们来说,都像是魔鬼,但面对一次次对肉体心灵的磨练, 4天时间,没有一人退缩,咬牙坚持到终点。 【故事1】 寻“宝”地图 是30年前的 “我们已将给你们的奖励沿途藏好,找得到它们,晚餐就不用担心了。” 教官刚宣布完按图行进的任务,一听“晚餐”两字,特战队员兴奋起来, “就是拿着地图找路嘛,简单。” 当拿到地图,发了懵,发到他们手里的,是一张86年版的老式地图。 “在实战中,没有人给你们最准确的地图, 如何识图用图、判定坐标和方位,是你们必须具备的能力。出发!” 一声令下,特战队员勒紧腰带,颠了颠背上80多斤的背囊,向山林深处冲去。 刚钻进林中,队员郑江就听到清晰的“嘶嘶”声传来, 队员们轻抬脚步,捂着胸口,生怕有蛇从脚下的草地蹿出来。 【故事2】 催泪弹夜袭 一晚被“炸”醒8次 “轰”一声巨响,刚钻进帐篷还没焐热睡袋的特战队员秦泽锋就被炸醒,没等反应过来, 一股刺激性极强的气体飘进来,鼻涕眼泪流一脸, “糟糕,‘敌人’来了。”队员们一个鲤鱼打挺,抹了一把脸,迅速穿好衣服,背上装备冲进山林。 一轮“苦战”后,本以为可以睡个安稳觉。 紧接着,第二次、第三次……一晚上,连被“炸”醒8次。 第二天一早,天刚蒙蒙亮,折腾一晚的队员又开始新一轮山地追逃, 17公里的奔袭后,接着连续抢占海拔900米的山顶制高点。 一到终点,累得跪倒在地。
武警8750部队医院加强手机保密管理工作 官兵学习 云南网讯手机使用管理规定放宽了,如何抓好手机保密管理工作? 近期,武警8750部队医院采取多项措施,进一步加强手机保密管理工作,确保部队绝对安全稳定。 “上班时间,科室上班人员,禁止使用手机!” 这是医院办公室下发不久的通知。 据院长韩新明介绍,为了执行好《武警部队手机和互联网使用管理办法》, 新年度医院制定的上班管理制度,将会有意识的向手机保密管理方向倾斜。 医院利用教育时间,组织官兵学习《武警部队手机和互联网使用管理办法》, 观看《手机背后的间谍》等警示教育片, 并利用互联网、黑板报等载体,宣传手机泄密隐患和途径, 引导官兵认清当前手机窃密手段高超的严峻形势,要时刻绷紧保密这根弦; 充分发挥“三互”“三帮一带”“双四一”等载体的监督作用, “身边人”互相监督,齐抓共管,使“十二条”规定和“四个禁止一个必须”等法规落到实处, 营造健康安全的手机使用环境; 成立保密委员检查组,对全院开展手机使用专项整治, 重点对网管中心、勤务队两个单位进行“不打招呼”的监督检查。 坚持对手机涉密行为“零容忍”态度,做到“发现一起、查处一起”, 对违反规定的单位和个人,依据条令条例进行纪律处理,并追究当事人及相关领导责任。 面对家人提出通过微信发送军装照的要求,勤务队新兵吴泰森认真地说: “部队有规定,不能发军装照。 作为一名战士,我要当好手机上的好哨兵,站好手机安全这班岗。”
首页 1 2 3 下一页